Favorites of 2025: Tamar Berk – ‘ocd’

Why Tamar Berk deserves your attention

Tamar Berk is one of those rare musical talents who not only pour raw emotion into her songs but also writes, records, and produces them herself — forging a sound world that’s intensely personal, lo-fi‑grounded, and vivid. On her new 2025 album ocd, she delivers what many consider her most ambitious and emotionally immersive work yet: a reverb-soaked journey into looping thoughts, obsessions, and the restless inner life.

Raised on classical piano and early Disney soundtracks, Berk eventually gravitated toward influences like The Beatles, David Bowie, Liz Phair, and Elliott Smith — a mix that shaped her instinct for melody, emotional catharsis, and lyrical truth. What she makes now, though, is something singular: indie rock and dream‑pop fused with DIY grit, emotional honesty, and the courage to bare her inner world.

In what follows, I want to explore Tamar Berk’s strengths as a musician — her multi-instrumentalism, her knack for mood and texture — and how on ocd she channels overthinking, vulnerability, and occasional panic into songs that feel like listening to someone thinking aloud.

Multi‑layered musician: instruments, production & power of solo control

One of the most striking aspects of Tamar Berk’s work is how much of it she controls herself. On ocd, she handles not only vocals and songwriting but also guitars, piano, synths, Wurlitzer, organ, bass, strings, programming, percussion — often layering sounds to produce something both intimate and richly textured.

That DIY ethos gives her music a special honesty. Because she’s involved in nearly every aspect, nothing feels over-polished or disingenuous — the distortions, reverb, and ambient murkiness all serve the truth of her emotional landscape. The result: a sound that lingers, unsettles, and stays with you.

In musical terms, that means ocd isn’t strictly an indie‑pop or alt‑rock album. It’s more like a fever dream — alternately noisy and delicate, sometimes urgent, sometimes hazy. The instrumentation shifts fluidly: thick, fuzzy guitars and sparse, somber piano; ghostly synths and grounded bass; literal sonic loops echoing the mental loops the lyrics describe.

At times, Berk leans into distortion and echo to evoke disorientation; at others, she strips things down to nothing but light keys, soft vocals, and a sense of fragile introspection. That dynamic — the back‑and‑forth between chaos and calm — is exactly what gives ocd its power.

Lyrical honesty: overthinking, mental spirals, and the beauty inside the mess

If the music gives you the frame, the lyrics are the beating heart of ocd. This is an album that wears its anxieties on its sleeve — about obsession, memory, identity, self-doubt, longing, and the loops of anxiety and overthinking. As Berk puts it, she called the album ocd because she “lives in loops. I overthink everything. But this record helped me make a little bit of beautiful sense out of that.”

The lead single ‘Stay Close By’ sets the tone for the album: dreamy guitars and soft vocals weave around lyrics of indecision, longing, and inertia — “I don’t know why I can’t reply on time, or can’t make up my mind,” she sings. The result feels like a confession whispered in a quiet room: vulnerable, real, and ache-filled.

But not all of ocd wallows plaintively. The title track ocd itself confronts mental spirals head‑on, repeating lines like “I got OCD … over and over and over,” rendering the relentlessness of intrusive thoughts in musical form: looping, dizzying, claustrophobic.

Elsewhere, Berk’s songwriting explores memory, regret, longing, and desire for escape — or at least some kind of emotional catharsis. The songs move between bleak introspection and moments of fragile hope, capturing that tension many of us live with: the part that fears and ruminates, and the part that still wants connection, meaning, or release. As one summary puts it, ocd “invites listeners into her inner thoughts” — messy, complicated, yet somehow familiar and human.

A sonic and emotional arc: ocd as a map of inner turbulence

What makes ocd compelling — and perhaps unique in the indie scene this year — is how well its musical and lyrical elements align to create an overall arc: it feels less like a collection of songs and more like a single, immersive experience. Berk seems to want to draw listeners into her mind, step by step, track by track.

The album shifts between dream‑pop haze and rock‑tinged fervor, between introspective hush and emotional outburst. That dynamic — of contrast and layering — mirrors the experience of anxiety, overthinking, and identity searching. On one track you might be floating in soft guitars and wistful melodies; on the next you’re confronting distortion, repetition, and confessional urgency.

That tonal range reflects the alternation many of us know well: memory and regret, hope and despair, the attempt to control thoughts and the surrender when it becomes too much. In that sense, ocd isn’t just music — it’s a kind of emotional landscape, felt in sound as much as in words.

Importantly, Berk doesn’t pretend to provide tidy resolutions. Her voice doesn’t promise that overthinking will end, or that clarity will come. Instead, she offers catharsis, empathy, and solidarity — a map for all the tangled thoughts, the dark nights, the loops. It’s messy. It’s real. But it’s shared.

Why ocd matters as growth

For longtime followers of Tamar Berk, ocd may feel familiar in some ways: there are still fuzzy guitars, melodic hooks, and a DIY spirit. But this album marks a new level of ambition and vulnerability. As one review noted, this is her “most personal and intense work yet.”

Her growth is obvious — not just as a songwriter, but as a producer and composer. The fact that she plays multiple instruments, layers them herself, and co-produces the record gives ocd a cohesiveness and authenticity that few albums achieve. The emotional weight doesn’t come across as polished or packaged — it feels lived, raw, and human.

Moreover, at a time when mental health, overthinking, and the pressures of modern life feel increasingly pervasive, ocd offers something rare: a mirror that’s honest but compassionate. It doesn’t romanticize anxiety; it doesn’t idealize healing. It simply says: this is what it feels like. And maybe that’s enough — maybe that kind of honesty is exactly what art should do.

In that sense, Tamar Berk isn’t just writing songs — she’s doing what few musicians do: giving voice to inner chaos, shaping it into melody and texture, and inviting you to sit with it all. ocd isn’t easy listening. It’s hard, sometimes disquieting. But it’s real. And in its messy honesty lies its power.

Final thoughts: Tamar Berk as a voice for the over‑thinkers, the dreamers, the stranded

There’s a long tradition in music of turning pain into beauty, chaos into catharsis — but few artists do it with as much rawness, intimacy, and creative control as Tamar Berk. On ocd, she doesn’t just invite you in: she opens the door, hands you something fragile, and says, “this is what it feels like.”

That willingness to expose uncertainty, loops of thought, doubt — is an act of bravery. And as a listener, you’re not just a spectator: you become a companion in the spirals. Maybe you don’t walk out with answers. But you walk out with somewhere to begin.

If you’ve ever felt your thoughts spin too fast, if you’ve ever felt stuck in loops of regret or longing — ocd is for you. And even if you haven’t, this record might just show you what you never knew you could feel so deeply: the strange beauty of overthinking — and the power of turning it into art.

Give it a listen. Turn the lights down. And let Tamar Berk lead you through the loops.

Video of The Day: Third of Never – Damage The Pearl

Damage the Pearl,” the standout title track from Third of Never’s latest record, is one of those songs that feels instantly lived-in—emotionally weathered, musically tight, and lyrically honest in ways that reward repeat listens. What Third of Never does so well across their catalog, melding melodic rock with angular edges, reflective lyricism, and a sense of drama that never tips into excess, comes into sharper focus here. The song is as much about mood as it is about narrative, and it invites the listener into a world where beauty and fracture sit side-by-side.

From the opening seconds, the track establishes a sonic landscape marked by contrast. Guitars shimmer and bite, building a foundation that feels both urgent and dreamlike. That duality mirrors the song’s thematic tension: “damage” and “pearl” aren’t just opposing concepts; they’re the twin poles around which the emotional arc revolves. The metaphor is simple but resonant—the “pearl” as something precious, hard-won, and vulnerable to harm; the “damage” as both external force and self-inflicted consequence.

Doug McMillen’s vocal performance lends the song much of its emotional depth. His delivery is unhurried but charged, as though he’s carefully excavating each phrase. There’s a rasp at the edges that suggests long nights, regrets, and resilience. He doesn’t dramatize the lyrics so much as inhabit them, giving the impression that the story being told has been carried quietly for a long time before finally being voiced.

Musically, the band strikes an impressive balance between tight arrangement and spacious atmosphere. Steve Potak’s keyboard textures ripple through the mix, adding color without overwhelming the guitars. His playing brings a sense of uplift to the darker corners of the track, hinting that even in the midst of damage, there’s clarity or even transcendence to be found. The rhythm section keeps the song grounded, propulsive without being forceful, allowing the emotional tension to breathe.

Lyrically, “Damage the Pearl” explores the fragile points in relationships—the places where trust is tested, where mistakes leave marks, where people confront the limits of what can be repaired. But the song resists cynicism. Instead, it seems to inhabit that complicated emotional terrain where hope and regret coexist. When the chorus opens up, the sense of release is less cathartic triumph and more a weary, honest exhalation. The band understands that complexity is sometimes more powerful than resolution.

The production enhances this emotional palette. Clean, spacious, and unafraid of subtle imperfections, it allows each instrument to carry its own weight. There’s no sense of overpolishing; the track feels human, textured, and lived-in. That sense of authenticity shapes the listening experience: the song sounds like a confession whispered and then amplified into the open air.

“Damage the Pearl” ultimately succeeds because it serves as both a strong standalone track and a thematic touchstone for the album bearing its name. It captures Third of Never’s ability to marry craft and feeling—to write rock music that is polished but soulful, introspective but accessible. It lingers after it ends, like a bruise you only notice when you press on it, and like a pearl that gleams all the more for having survived pressure.

Favorite of 2025: The Beths – Straight Line Was A Lie

Introduction: Why The Beths Matter

The New Zealand indie‑pop quartet The Beths have long stood out for their sharp songwriting, earworm melodies, and the emotional honesty that pulses through their lyrics. With their 2025 album Straight Line Was a Lie, they arrive at a new peak — refined in sound yet deeply raw in sentiment. It’s a record that doesn’t just reaffirm what makes them special; it feels like a rebirth: more considered, more textured, and more vulnerable than ever. As the band enters this next chapter, it’s become increasingly clear that The Beths aren’t just good at what they do — they’re extraordinary.

I want to take a moment and explore how each member’s musical contributions blend to form the band’s signature sound, and how the lyrics on Straight Line Was a Lie carve out an intimate, unsettling, yet hopeful portrait of life, growth, and mental health.

First, a quick refresher on the lineup. The Beths consist of:

  • Elizabeth Stokes – lead vocals, rhythm guitar, main songwriter
  • Jonathan Pearce – lead guitar, backing vocals, producer/engineer (on this record)
  • Benjamin Sinclair – bass guitar, backing vocals
  • Tristan Deck – drums, cymbals and percussion, backing vocals

In past releases, The Beths were already celebrated for their “jangly” guitar pop, shimmering harmonies, and driving rhythm section.  On Straight Line Was a Lie, each member seems to lean more deeply into their strengths, and — crucially — into experimentation.

Elizabeth Stokes remains the heart of the band. Her voice — often conversational, sometimes aching — carries the emotional weight; her lyrical voice is sharper, more introspective, grappling frankly with themes of mental health, existential anxiety, familial ties, self-doubt, and the paradoxes of healing. The songs come from a place of personal upheaval, shaped by her experiences with health struggles, medication, and self‑reflection.

Jonathan Pearce wears dual hats on this record: lead guitarist and producer / engineer / mixer (on most tracks). That shift seems to have given the album a more cohesive, textured sonic palette: guitars (both his lead and Stokes’s rhythm) shimmer, sizzle, crash — sometimes jangly, sometimes atmospheric, sometimes dissonant. On songs like “Take,” the guitar solos ring with a fresh urgency; on “Ark of the Covenant,” guitar lines meld with subtle ambient touches to build something cinematic and haunting.

Benjamin Sinclair’s bass underpins the album with steady, often driving low‑end that grounds even the most introspective or experimental moments. While bass can be underappreciated in guitar‑heavy pop, here it anchors songs like “Take” with a muscular backbone that gives weight to the emotional landscape, and in upbeat numbers it drives the momentum forward, pushing choruses into sing‑along territory. The result is a rhythm section that feels both steady and alive.

Tristan Deck’s drumming and percussion complete the engine. On Straight Line Was a Lie, the drums don’t just keep time — they accentuate mood, shake loose tension, and steer transitions between jubilation and melancholy. Whether it’s propulsive beats on faster tracks or minimal, contemplative rhythms on the quieter ones, Deck’s playing adapts to the emotional terrain without overshadowing it. Backing vocals from Deck and Sinclair add subtle harmonic depth, reinforcing what has always been The Beths’ hallmark: layered vocal harmonies that linger.

Together, these four don’t just play instruments — they channel mood, memory, and meaning. On this record, the result feels less like a “band playing songs” and more like four people collaboratively mapping emotional terrain.

The sound of Straight Line Was a Lie: More than “jangly” pop

One of the defining qualities of The Beths’ earlier albums was that “jangly guitar + power‑pop hooks + emotional honesty” formula — and it worked beautifully. On Straight Line Was a Lie, they keep the hooks, but deepen the textures. The production (led by Pearce) emphasizes space, layering, contrast; songs can shift from bright, chiming pop to darker, atmospheric, even gritty territory. Critics note this album as “bigger, better and more complicated than they’ve ever been.”

The opening track and title song begins with a false start — a spoken “sorry I was thinking about something else” — a move that feels deliberate: it sets the tone for an album preoccupied with interruption, derailment, and return. The lyric “I thought I was getting better / But I’m back to where I started / And the straight line was a circle / Yeah the straight line was a lie” resounds as a central thesis. Life, the record suggests, is not a linear progression but a messy, looping, often contradictory journey.

Meanwhile, tracks like “No Joy” jolt with nervy urgency — the upbeat melody and driving beat bely lyrics that speak to anhedonia and existential stasis: “All my pleasures, guilty / Clean slate looking filthy / This year’s gonna kill me … Spirit should be crushing / But I don’t feel sad, I feel nothing.”

On “Metal,” they give form to something beautiful and strange: a metaphor about being alive as a “collaboration of bacteria, carbon and light,” needing “the metal in your blood to keep you alive.” It’s biological, cosmic, grounded, and dreamlike all at once — marrying emotion, science, and wonder in a simple but powerful package.

There’s also room for quiet minimalism. “Mother, Pray for Me” strips things back: gentle picking, soft vocals, aching longing. It’s a song about complicated family, grief, and generational wounds — and it lands not through bombast but through tender reserve.

Even the album’s final moments — on “Best Laid Plans” — feel bittersweet: jangly guitars and a buoyant rhythm, but implicit in the instrumentation and tone is a sense of unresolved longing, of “unfinished business.” It’s the sound of hope, but also of memory’s weight.

In sum: Straight Line Was a Lie isn’t simply “jangly indie pop with hooks” — it’s more ambitious: emotionally deeper, texturally richer, and willing to lean into shadows as much as light.

Lyrical worlds: Mental health, Memory, and the Myth of Progress

If the musical side is about textures, the lyrical work is about truth. On this record, The Beths — primarily through Stokes’s pen — interrogate themes of mental health, healing, identity, memory, and the uneasy breaks in between. The album’s title succinctly captures its philosophical impulse: that “linear progression is an illusion.” Life doesn’t follow a neat arc; healing does not happen on a straight line.

Much of that perspective comes from Stokes’s own life. In recent years she’s navigated serious health challenges (including a diagnosis with Graves’ disease), anxiety, and the disorienting effects of starting antidepressants for the first time. That upheaval forced a radical shift in how she writes: among other changes, she turned to stream‑of‑consciousness writing on a typewriter, exploring memories and feelings she’d avoided, and forcing herself to reckon with difficult emotions.

That kind of emotional honesty shows up throughout. On “Mosquitoes,” she wanders a creek near her home — a haven when “my house felt like a locked room” — only to find devastation: the same creek turned into a “raging sea” after floods. The song becomes quietly terrifying: an elegy to disappearance, impermanence, and the fragility of refuge.

In “Til My Heart Stops,” there’s a longing for simple embodied pleasures — riding a bike in the rain, flying a kite, dancing — even as the world feels heavy and weightless at once. According to one review, the song, with its unsettling distortion and ghostly atmosphere, “charts the fragility of life itself,” its abrupt ending like a heart’s final beat.

Elsewhere, “Ark of the Covenant” and “Best Laid Plans” explore inner excavation: digging through memory, confronting “fossilised nightmares,” searching for meaning — or closure — in the negative space of the self.

But it’s not purely despair or existential weight. There’s still wry humour, sharp imagery, and defiant tenderness. The need for “metal in your blood” in “Metal” — a call for grounding, resilience, a kind of elemental insistence on life — turns the personal and biological into something poetic and universal.

Taken together, the lyrics on Straight Line Was a Lie don’t just reflect mental health struggles or personal trauma — they interrogate the myth of constant improvement. They suggest healing is messy; growth is circular; humanity is fragile, often contradictory — but still worthy of wonder.

What this album means: Growth, Maturation, and a New Chapter for The Beths

For longtime fans, Straight Line Was a Lie may at first sound familiar: The Beths still write songs that stick in your brain. But this time, there’s a sense of expansion, of maturity, of ambition being reframed with nuance. Production is richer, the emotional stakes higher, and nothing feels simply disposable or background music. This is an album that rewards — demands — close listening.

Critically, the record has been widely praised. On aggregators it earns a strong Metascore, reflecting generally favorable to enthusiastic reviews. Reviewers note the band is “bigger, better and more complicated than they’ve ever been.” Others call it perhaps their “most incisive” album yet, one where existential anxieties and lyrical ambition meet pop hooks and evocative soundscapes.

Moreover, Straight Line Was a Lie feels like a milestone — not just in their discography, but in their artistic evolution. The move to have guitarist Jonathan Pearce handle production and engineering gives the album a more unified sonic identity. The decision by Stokes to overhaul her songwriting method — to face trauma, memory, and illness head‑on — brings a weight and vulnerability previously only hinted at. The whole band seems aligned: playing not just with precision and popcraft, but with emotional honesty.

For listeners, this album offers more than catchy choruses: it offers fellowship. It whispers that you are not alone if you’ve felt lost, stuck, or numb. It suggests that healing is not always about triumphs or tallies of progress, but about maintenance — about showing up, living, feeling, enduring. And it does all that while giving you songs you can dance to, or cry to, or sing loud at a concert.

Conclusion: The Beths as Emotional Architects

In a world that often feels driven by optimization, forward momentum, and constant productivity, Straight Line Was a Lie comes as a quiet, necessary reckoning. It refuses the idea that healing, growth, or life itself must follow a neat, linear trajectory. Instead, The Beths propose a different metaphor: life as cyclical, messy, and ongoing — something to be maintained, revisited, reflected upon, not “completed.”

As a band, The Beths have always been more than the sum of their catchy hooks or jangly guitars. On this album, they feel less like a pop act and more like emotional architects — sculptors of feeling, memory, and existential wonder. Each band member’s contribution is essential — from Stokes’s wrenching lyrics to Pearce’s layered production, from Sinclair’s grounding bass to Deck’s subtle but powerful rhythms.

Straight Line Was a Lie may end up being a soundtrack for an era — an album for when the world feels too fast, too forward, too relentlessly optimistic. It offers instead a different rhythm: patience, honesty, acceptance, and defiance.

If you haven’t listened to it yet — or haven’t listened closely — this is the moment: sit back, headphones on, and let The Beths guide you down the crooked, beautiful trail.

The Beatles Anthology Hits Disney+ — and the Band Is Somehow Still Breaking Up Before Our Eyes

Taking time over Thanksgiving to watch The Beatles Anthology feels like pausing the noise of the present to sit with something timeless. The documentary’s sweep—its memories, its contradictions, its fragile humanity—lands differently when you experience it in the soft lull between holiday meals and family chatter. It becomes less a history lesson and more a reminder of how rare it is for art to reshape the world, and rarer still for us to slow down long enough to feel it. In the quiet of the holiday, the story of four kids from Liverpool overrunning an entire century feels both impossibly distant and strangely intimate, like rediscovering a familiar warmth you didn’t realize you’d missed.

There’s a moment early in The Beatles Anthology—now revived on Disney+ like a relic exhumed from a time capsule of swinging London and acid-washed utopianism—where you realize that no matter how many times you’ve heard the same myth, you’re still powerless to resist the gravitational pull of The Beatles. It’s not just nostalgia. It’s not even hero worship, though that’s baked into the culture at this point like sugar in a doughnut. It’s the strange, lingering shock of discovering that four kids from Liverpool somehow hijacked the 20th century, and we’re still picking through the wreckage.

Watching Anthology in 2025 feels a bit like binge-reading someone’s diary long after they’ve died and been canonized. The documentary is part time machine, part séance, part messy family photo album. And now, thanks to Disney+, the whole thing is packaged with the glossy inevitability of a Marvel re-release. Press play, and suddenly we’re back on the rooftop, or on the plane to JFK, or in Hamburg, crawling out of seedy bars before they even knew they were supposed to be legends.

The Beatles never asked to become a religion. But they didn’t exactly discourage it either.

Anthology as a Resurrection Machine

When Anthology first aired in 1995, it was a sprawling, nostalgic reconciliation project—three surviving Beatles trying to square the circle of their own history. It arrived with two “new” songs, “Free as a Bird” and “Real Love,” as if John Lennon were phoning in demos from the afterlife. There was a sense of closure, or at least the illusion of it.

Rewatching it now, the illusion fades fast.

Because what hits you is how unbelievably young they were when the circus erupted. The early footage is almost indecent: mop-topped cherubs strumming their way into global hysteria. Ringo looks like he still hasn’t figured out the joke. George hovers in the background with the Zen intensity of a kid already dreaming of escape. John and Paul—codependent, competitive, inseparable—seem like two halves of a single supernova destined to explode.

Disney+ doesn’t change any of this. But it reframes it. The Beatles come to us now in algorithmic form, recommended alongside Star Wars and The Simpsons. They’re no longer the gods of Rock History textbooks. They’re content.

And yet they refuse to shrink. What other band could endure a nine-part documentary and still leave you wanting more?

The Eternal Breakup

The thing people forget about Anthology is that it’s basically one long breakup album told in documentary form. You can almost feel the tectonic plates shifting as the series moves from Beatlemania to the studio years. The cameras stop capturing exhilaration and start capturing exhaustion.

“Help!” stops sounding like a joke.

“Yesterday” stops sounding like a fluke.

“Hey Jude” starts to feel like an apology.

The Beatles’ story is a tragedy disguised as a fairy tale. And Anthology never tries to hide that. In the early episodes, they’re compact and hungry and full of possibility. By the end, they’re four planets drifting out of orbit, held together only by tape, memory, and the vicious tenderness of old friends trying desperately not to say the wrong thing.

The venerable rock critic Lester Bangs would have loved this. He worshiped honesty almost as much as he worshiped guitars, and he would’ve recognized the profound emotional carnage humming under the surface of the Beatles myth. He would’ve also called them out for the contradictions—for preaching love while sometimes barely being able to stand each other, for reinventing the world while struggling to reinvent themselves.

But he would have forgiven them, too. Because the music was that good.

Beatlemania in the Age of Streaming

One of the strangest pleasures of the Disney+ re-release is how it recasts Anthology as a binge-worthy epic. You can watch the band evolve in real time, like some impossible evolution chart:

Cavemen in leather jackets → Cheeky pop savants → Psychedelic revolutionaries → Mature studio alchemists → Four guys too tired to keep pretending.

In the streaming era, this trajectory feels almost too clean, too narratively convenient. Today’s bands barely last two albums before the internet atomizes them into solo projects, Twitter feuds, or boutique coffee brands. The Beatles lasted about a decade, and in that decade they authored the modern idea of what a band could be.

What Anthology shows—sometimes accidentally—is that even at their peak, The Beatles were never comfortable with being The Beatles. That’s the secret fuel of the entire documentary: they’re constantly trying to escape the gravitational force of their own creation.

George Harrison’s weary look in the late ’60s? That’s the face of a man trapped inside someone else’s mythology.

The Beautiful, Exhausting Machinery of Genius

One of the most fascinating through-lines in Anthology is the insight it gives into the creative engine of Lennon-McCartney. There’s a moment where they’re discussing writing “With a Little Help from My Friends,” casually tossing out ideas like they’re doodling in the margins of history.

Paul: “What about this?”

John: “Hmm, okay, but maybe make it a bit more… weird.”

George Martin: “Boys, that’s quite good.”

Audience of millions worldwide: Loses mind. This is the alchemy fans come for. The magic trick. The thing we pretend we can understand.

But Anthology also gives us something rarer: the gears beneath the magic. The insecurities. The imposter syndrome. The grind. These guys didn’t just wake up and write “Something” or “A Day in the Life.” They worked. They argued. They pushed each other to the brink. If rock mythology usually polishes everything into legend, Anthology leaves the fingerprints.

Seeing the Beatles Through 2025 Eyes

Maybe the strangest thing about revisiting Anthology now is how contemporary it feels. The media frenzy, the public-private split, the pressure to constantly innovate—it all maps eerily onto modern celebrity culture, except the Beatles didn’t have social media to amplify their every misstep. Imagine John Lennon on Twitter. Imagine Paul McCartney forced to explain the concept of “Paperback Writer” on TikTok.

And yet, despite the decades between then and now, the emotional churn of the documentary still lands. You feel the claustrophobia of fame. You feel the thrill of artistic discovery. You feel the heartbreak of watching four people who genuinely loved each other become unable to continue sharing the same world.

Paul’s grief in the early ’80s interviews is still palpable. George’s dry humor remains a perfect counterweight. Ringo—god bless him—anchors everything with the resigned joy of someone who knew from day one that he was lucky to be there, even when it broke his heart.

The End Still Hurts

By the time Anthology reaches the breakup, there’s no surprise left. You know it’s coming. You know the rooftop concert is the final performance. You know that lawsuits and bitterness and tabloid nonsense overshadowed the final chapter.

And yet it still hurts. It always does.

Because Anthology makes clear that the Beatles weren’t just a band—they were a lifelong conversation. And like all great conversations, it eventually exhausted itself. “The dream is over,” Lennon sings in 1970. But Anthology shows that the dream was already cracking long before he said the words.

So Why Watch Again?

Because Anthology is the closest thing we have to the Beatles telling their own story—warts, brilliance, contradictions and all. And because in 2025, in a world where music is increasingly reduced to background noise for workouts and commutes, watching their evolution unfold over 10 hours feels almost radical.

It reminds us that music once mattered enough to rewrite the world. And that four flawed, brilliant people somehow changed everything before they even understood what they were doing.

Final Thought

Watching The Beatles Anthology on Disney+ is like returning to the scene of a beautiful accident. You know how it ends. You know who gets hurt. You know which friendships survive and which don’t. But you can’t look away, because the wreckage is too gorgeous and too human to ignore.

Lester Bangs would have told you the same thing, only louder, with more profanity, and while throwing on Revolver at full volume to prove a point. But the point remains:

The Beatles aren’t just a band. They’re a feeling. And Anthology—even three decades later—reminds us why that feeling still refuses to die.

The Madness of Resurrection: Why Let It Be (2025 Remaster) Feels Like a Miracle

It’s one of those things that should never have happened. A scruffy, half-broken underdog band from Minneapolis — ragged, defiant, often self-sabotaging — getting the deluxe archival treatment usually reserved for polished legends, for “classic rock” cathedrals. Yet here we are: 2025, and Rhino Records (a part of Warner Music Group) has dusted off Let It Be, remixed, remastered, reboxed, expanded — and in doing so given the world a second chance to see the bruised poetry of the original 1984 record in high fidelity.

The fact that The Replacements are getting this kind of attention now — decades after their original flame flickered out — is almost absurd. And yet that absurdity is perfect. Because Let It Be was never meant to be smooth. It was meant to hurt, to stumble, to scream. The Deluxe Edition doesn’t try to smooth those edges — it highlights them, reminding us why this band never fit neatly into the mainstream, and why that’s exactly why they mattered.

The Skeletons & the Heart — An Album Understood

Originally released in 1984 via the indie label Twin/Tone Records, Let It Be was a moment of clarity for The Replacements: a record of transition, of longing, of half-formed innocence battered against a rock & roll dream.

The 2025 Deluxe Edition gives us disc one: the remastered original album — eleven songs that remain as vivid, ragged, and vital as ever. Then comes the rarities — alternate versions, outtakes, home demos — and a full 28-song live set from March 1984 at the Cubby Bear in Chicago.

This isn’t a rehydrated corpse. It’s a beating heart, reconnected. It’s the band as they were — flawed, sprawling, incomplete — presented again not as “heritage,” but as rock & roll living in the cracks between hope and chaos.

Track by Track: The Skin & Bones of Youth

Think about “I Will Dare” — opener of the album and a dare in itself. That fuzz-ed cardinal riff, the off-kilter swagger, Paul Westerberg’s voice like it’s scraping against the point of a razor. The 2025 remaster gives the guitars more room to breathe; you hear the strings buzz, the drum skins snap, and every syllable of “dare” tastes like adrenaline. It lands like a punch in the gut — and that’s exactly the point.

Then there’s “Favorite Thing,” where the punk cheek turns into something almost tender. A strange, shimmering melody over brittle chords, a voice struggling between affection and alienation: “I just don’t know what to do.” On the original vinyl you heard the ghosts of cheap amps and cigarette smoke; on this remaster you hear the humanity underneath.

“We’re Comin’ Out,” “Tommy Gets His Tonsils Out,” “Black Diamond” — all of them jittery, half-formed attempts at grandeur, teenage longing, and adolescent confusion. But the album’s heart lives in songs like “Androgynous” and “Unsatisfied.”

“Androgynous”: one of the few rock songs in history that wears its empathy on its sleeve without collapsing into sanctimony. A melody that aches, lyrics that don’t posture — and in 2025, the alternate version restores a full piano intro, a different vocal take: a softer, more haunted Replacements, vulnerable but unpretentious. 

“Unsatisfied”: bitter, ragged, full of longing. Westerberg’s voice cracks, the rhythm stutters, the world trembles. On this remaster, the grit is there, but so is the clarity — the bass-line you never heard before, the snare drum’s tiny echo, the breath between words. It’s like seeing an old scar under better light — you cringe, but you also understand how it shaped the person.

Songs like “Answering Machine” — small, shy, off-kilter — make you feel the quiet desperation of isolation, of trying to connect and hearing nothing but static. On this remaster, those staticky edges sharpen; the loneliness doesn’t sound like a studio effect anymore, it sounds like the room you’re in after the lights go out.

Listening to Let It Be, side to side, track after track, is like rummaging through someone’s teenage bedroom: posters peeling off drywall, cigarettes half-smoked in an ashtray, dreams scribbled over notebook margins. It doesn’t sound like “great production.” It sounds like truth.

Why Let It Be Was Always Too Big for Its Boots — and Yet Never Big Enough

The Replacements were never built for the spotlight. They were too ragged around the edges, too self-aware, too… real. And by “real” I mean “full of contradictions.” They wanted fame, but they didn’t want the shackles that come with it. They chased rebellion, but they also had voices cracked open by longing. They wrote love songs when they barely knew how to keep their own lives together.

By the time they were capable of being “bigger,” self-destruction and disillusionment had already set in. The guitarist whose shards of noise cut through Let It Be — Bob Stinson — drifted away soon after. Addiction, inner demons, burnout: the usual rock mythology that turns alive bands into ghost stories. 

It’s improbable that a band like The Replacements would ever get a deluxe archival box. It’s even more improbable we’d get one in 2025 — a time when nostalgia usually means safe, stable comfort records. But part of what makes this remaster so thrilling is that it refuses comfort. It resurrects the mess. It preserves the fractures. It honors the band not as legends, but as poets of sloppiness, heartbreak, and restless hope.

That’s why this reissue is more than just for longtime fans. It’s for anyone who ever felt like an outsider, anyone who ever saw beauty in chaos, anyone who ever listened to music and found pieces of themselves in the distortion.

What the 2025 Deluxe Edition Actually Adds — the Blood Under the Skin

Thanks to Rhino’s box, we now have a wealth of previously inaccessible material: alternate takes of “Gary’s Got a Boner,” “Favorite Thing,” a restored alternate of “Androgynous,” unreleased outtakes like “Who’s Gonna Take Us Alive” and “Street Girl,” home demos, and more. 

But perhaps the jewel in the set is the 28-song live set from March 1984 at the Cubby Bear, Chicago. A crowd-sourced tape, long buried in obscurity, now remastered and set free. On this live set you hear the band thrashing through not just Let It Be material, but older punk-raw cuts, covers of The Beach Boys, Bad Company, and the kind of sweaty, ragged, near-chaotic energy that only a band on the edge can deliver.

Rhino.com will also offer an exclusive bonus 10-inch vinyl release, Live at City Garden. Bundled with the vinyl edition and a T-shirt, this six-song soundboard recording was captured at the legendary Trenton, New Jersey, punk club on February 11, 1984. Highlights of the live EP include a rare performance of the ballad “You’re Getting Married,” played at the request of the band’s original manager and Twin/Tone co-founder Peter Jesperson, who also co-produced both the original Let It Be and the new deluxe edition. That track is a small, strange flower growing out of the concrete of punk rock — gentle, awkward, and deeply human.

These extras don’t feel like padding. They feel like excavation. They don’t try to mythologize the band — they just show: this was real. This was messy. This was alive.

For Fans & The Uninitiated — Two Doors to the Same Room

If you’ve loved The Replacements for decades, this Deluxe Edition is catharsis. It’s memory, resurrection, vindication. It’s turning the lights back on in a room you once lived in — seeing every cigarette burn mark on the table, the scratched vinyls leaning against the wall, the ghost of teenage hope in the corner.

If you’re new to The Replacements — maybe you grew up after the vinyl era, maybe your Spotify algorithm just nudged you — Let It Be (2025 Deluxe Edition) is a perfect entry point. The remaster cleans — but doesn’t polish — the sound. It clarifies, but doesn’t sterilize. And the expanded material draws out the band’s contradictions: tender yet abrasive, sloppy yet sincere, desperate yet hopeful.

In a moment where rock & roll sometimes feels like it’s been shoved into a nostalgia museum — safe, curated, predictable — this reissue punches through: real ragged edges, real emotion, real imperfection. It reminds you that rock was once a refuge for freaks, for outsiders, for the restless.

What Could’ve Been — And Why It Still Means Something

It’s almost uncanny: listening to Let It Be now, you can hear the potential of a much bigger future. Songs like “I Will Dare” and “Androgynous” aren’t just artifacts of mid-80s indie; you half expect them to echo off arenas, to lay foundations for generations. The Replacements had the songwriting, the heart, the courage — and at times, it sounds like they had the will for greatness.

But rock & roll doesn’t reward sincerity if the band can’t survive themselves. Bob Stinson’s drift, the instability, the lack of polish — all of that doomed them from riding their own wave. And in retrospect, that’s part of the charm. Let It Be feels like the greatest nearly-album the 1980s never let bloom fully.

The 2025 Deluxe Edition doesn’t rewrite that history. It doesn’t pretend the band got what they deserved. What it does is more courageous: it says, “Here is who they were. Here is what they felt. Here is the wreckage — and the beauty.” For anyone willing to peer into the wreckage, there’s a kind of redemption there.

A Final Salvo: Why Let It Be (2025) Matters

There’s a moment in the history of rock & roll when everything cracked wide open, when the neat boxes called “punk,” “indie,” “pop” blurred into something messy and human. The Replacements were among the first to do it — not by design, but by desperation, by honesty, by the stubborn belief that rock didn’t need to be polished to matter. Let It Be wasn’t just an album: it was a middle finger to complacency, a howl in the concrete night, a slag-heap love letter to the lonely.

In 2025, to give that album a deluxe reissue — remastered, expanded, recontextualized — is to say that those guttural screams, those jangly chords, those messy homespun ballads still matter. It’s a statement: that rock need not be perfect to be perfect. That pain, longing, chaos, longing, and heartbreak deserve clarity, not gloss.

If you’ve never heard The Replacements — or if all you know are legends and hearsay — this version of Let It Be is a gift. Not because it’s pretty, but because it’s honest. Not because it’s comfortable, but because it’s real.

So press play. Let the guitars crack. Let the drums rattle. Let the voices ache. Because the room is dark — and once you open the door, you might never want to leave.

Video of the Day: The Replacements: Let It Be (Deluxe Edition) Unboxing and Interview with Peter Jesperson

Unboxing Let It Be (Deluxe Edition) with Peter Jesperson feels a bit like opening a time capsule with the person who helped seal it shut decades ago. As he lifts the lid, there’s an unmistakable spark of recognition in his voice—each piece of packaging, every photo, every scuffed tape box seems to carry a memory only he can unlock. What might otherwise feel like a standard deluxe reissue suddenly becomes charged with lived history.

Jesperson doesn’t just describe the material; he animates it. He flips through the booklet and, in an offhand comment, drops you right back into the chaos and brilliance of The Replacements in 1984. The band’s humor, volatility, tenderness, and absolute unpredictability all surface as he recalls how certain songs came together or how a particular live moment found its way onto a bonus disc.

Moving through the set with him is like being guided by the band’s archivist-in-chief—someone who doesn’t merely know the story but lived inside it. His excitement is contagious, and as he handles each artifact, the deluxe edition becomes more than a product; it becomes a reunion with the band, filtered through someone who never stopped believing in them. In his hands, the ephemera transforms into something warm and personal, a reminder of how unlikely and extraordinary this music was—and still is.

YTAA 11-18-2025 on Mixcloud

It’s been a while since I found the time to upload a full show to Mixcloud! I promise to be better about posting them. The latest episode of YTAA 11-18-2025 is now available on Mixcloud. Please do me a favor and give it a listen when you have a chance.

Finding the time to post full episodes of Your Tuesday Afternoon Alternative on Mixcloud has been more of a challenge than I ever expected. What seems, on the surface, like a simple matter of uploading a show ends up being far more complicated once you stack it next to the responsibilities of everyday life, the planning that goes into each week’s broadcast, and the desire to make sure everything I share is as polished, listenable, and enjoyable as possible. I want to take the time to explain why it has taken me longer than it should to get full shows posted and—more importantly—to apologize for the delay and talk honestly about my commitment to becoming more consistent on Mixcloud.

First, producing Your Tuesday Afternoon Alternative isn’t just a matter of showing up, pressing “record,” and walking away. Even after so many years of doing the show, each episode requires preparation: listening to new music, organizing playlists, writing notes, checking information about artists, aligning segments, and making sure the flow feels right. That’s the part listeners hear directly. What listeners don’t see is everything that comes after the live broadcast—cleaning up the audio file, leveling tracks, trimming silence, removing dead air, tagging the episode, writing show notes, creating artwork, uploading everything, then double-checking it all to make sure it’s correct and accessible. It’s a process I care about, because sharing independent, alternative, and emerging music has always been something that deserves care.

But caring takes time, and time has been harder to come by lately.

Over the last several months (and, if I’m honest, probably longer than that), life has piled on its normal assortment of responsibilities: work, family, health, grading, teaching, commitments that can’t be rescheduled, and the thousand small tasks that accumulate without asking for permission. None of these things are unusual; they’re simply the parts of life that everyone negotiates in their own way. Yet what has happened, unintentionally, is that by the time I sit down to work on getting a full show uploaded, the day has already stretched far beyond the hours I planned on using.

Mixcloud uploads aren’t something I want to do halfway. I don’t want to toss a show online with minimal detail or sloppy audio just to say it’s there. That has never been the spirit of Your Tuesday Afternoon Alternative. The whole point is to introduce people to music worth hearing—bands pouring their hearts into their work, musicians making something genuine, songs with meaning and craft. That deserves a certain level of attention. It deserves to be done right.

And yet, even with the best intentions, the backlog grew.

So I want to be completely direct: I’m sorry. Sorry for taking so long to get episodes uploaded. Sorry for not communicating more clearly when I fell behind. Sorry for making listeners wait when so many of you reached out asking when the next show would be posted. Those messages were kind, encouraging, and patient—and every time I read one, it reminded me how much the show means to people who want to listen on their own schedule.

When people care enough to ask, that means something. And I don’t take that lightly.

The good news is that when you fall behind long enough, eventually you recognize that doing nothing only makes the problem larger. It is time to fix it. It is time to get the shows uploaded more consistently. It is time to make the Mixcloud archive what it should have been all along: a reliable place where listeners can catch up, re-listen, discover new music, or hear an episode they missed live.

I am committing—publicly and sincerely—to posting more consistently. That means setting aside designated time each week to prepare, edit, and upload the shows, even if that means reshuffling other tasks or being more disciplined about how I manage my schedule. It means breaking the work into smaller chunks so that it doesn’t feel overwhelming. It also means giving myself permission not to overthink every detail. The show should sound good, absolutely—but perfectionism can be just as paralyzing as disorganization.

More importantly, posting consistently is a way of honoring the musicians and bands who trust me with their art. It’s also a way of honoring the listeners who tune in every Tuesday afternoon, who send notes and recommendations, who say kind words about the music I share, and who make this show a genuine joy rather than another responsibility. If the live broadcast is about community, energy, and immediacy, then the Mixcloud archive is about access—about giving people the freedom to listen when and how they want, no matter their schedule.

I realize that promises are only as meaningful as the follow-through. Saying I will be more consistent is easy; actually doing it requires effort, planning, and accountability. So here is the practical plan: older shows will be uploaded in batches, and new episodes will go up shortly after each Tuesday broadcast. It may take a little time to clear the backlog, but the process has already begun, and I intend to keep it moving in a steady, realistic rhythm.

If you have been waiting, thank you—for your patience, your encouragement, your interest, and your willingness to stick with the show. If you’re new to the Mixcloud archive, welcome. And if you’re one of the many people who loves discovering under-the-radar music, I promise there is a lot coming your way.

In the end, Your Tuesday Afternoon Alternative has always been about connection: connecting listeners with artists, connecting independent musicians with audiences who want something outside the algorithm, and connecting a community that values creativity, heart, and authenticity in music. Getting the shows onto Mixcloud more reliably is part of strengthening those connections. It is part of respecting your time and honoring the work that musicians put into their craft.

So yes—it took me far too long. And yes—I am genuinely sorry for that.

But I am also incredibly grateful for everyone who continues to listen, share, and support the show. I appreciate you more than you know. And going forward, you can expect more consistent uploads, more reliable access to every episode, and the same commitment to sharing the best independent and alternative music I can find.

Thank you, sincerely—and stay tuned. The next batch of shows is on its way.

What is it that drives the feel in indie music?

Indie music unites us because it thrives on authenticity, creativity, and emotional honesty. Unlike heavily commercialized tracks, it often reflects personal stories, experimentation, and unique perspectives that feel relatable. Fans connect through shared emotions—heartbreak, joy, longing, or defiance—finding meaning in sounds and lyrics that resonate with their own lives. The community around indie music also matters: attending shows, sharing discoveries, and supporting artists fosters a sense of belonging, where people celebrate individuality while feeling part of something bigger.

The Beths’ Best Laid Plans exemplifies the power of rhythm and groove in creating an irresistible musical experience. At its core, the song is anchored by tight, punchy percussion and a driving bassline that create both energy and momentum. This rhythmic foundation gives the track a sense of forward motion, allowing the melody and vocals to shine while the listener is physically engaged—tapping toes, nodding heads, or even dancing along. The combination of percussive precision and melodic bass makes the song feel immediate and alive, illustrating how the “feel” of a song is just as important as its harmonic or lyrical content.

This attention to rhythm and groove is a hallmark of many artists across indie and alternative music. Tamar Berk, for instance, uses nuanced percussion to build layers of tension and release in her music, creating songs that feel both intimate and expansive. Bird Streets similarly blends melodic hooks with a driving rhythm section, demonstrating how bass and drums can define a track’s emotional pulse. Guided By Voices, with their lo-fi yet meticulously arranged recordings, often showcase how a tight rhythm section can make even a chaotic-sounding song feel cohesive and infectious. The Connells and The Cords similarly emphasize song craft, where the music propels the storytelling and emotional impact.

Meanwhile, vocalists like Kim Ware and her effort, The Good Graces, highlight the interplay between rhythm and vocal delivery. In Kim’s songs, the percussive drive and melodic bassline not only support the vocal narrative but enhance the emotional resonance, creating moments of release and catharsis that linger with the listener. Just as The Beths use rhythm to energize Best Laid Plans, these artists leverage bass and percussion to make the music physically and emotionally engaging, proving that the “feel” of a song—its groove, drive, and momentum—is a central component of its power.

Ultimately, what unites these artists is a deep understanding of how guitar, percussion, bass, and overall feel can transform a song from a static composition into a living, breathing experience. From The Beths’ infectious grooves to Bird Streets’ emotive rhythms, from Guided By Voices’ lo-fi magic to Kim Ware’s soulful pulse, these musicians remind us that feel, texture and rhythm are not just accompaniment—it’s a force that connects listeners, moves bodies, and conveys emotions that words alone cannot capture.

Dr. J’s take… The Brilliance of Trace—Son Volt’s Rusted Hymn to the Wreckage

The first time I heard Son Volt’s Trace, I thought, “Ah hell, here it is: Uncle Tupelo’s divorce decree, notarized on reel-to-reel, filed away in some Missouri courthouse basement where the plaster peels and the janitor drinks Falstaff or Bud Light out of a Styrofoam cup.” Jay Farrar stomps out of the wreckage, lugging his guitar like a busted-down jalopy radiator, and instead of screaming, he sighs, drawls, lets the words leak out slow like oil seeping into gravel. This isn’t rock and roll as firecracker catharsis; it’s rust-belt requiem. It’s the sound of gas stations going dark one by one on Route 66 and every half-drunk loner still praying the neon sign will flicker back to life.

See, Farrar isn’t interested in saving your soul or even giving you a hook to hum while you brush your teeth. He’s interested in reminding you that America has grit and grime, and the old idols, they are rotting.

Listen to “Windfall.” That harmonica doesn’t soar; it wheezes like your uncle’s lungs after three decades underground in coal mines. Yet it lifts you anyway, like catching a breeze on a road you know dead-ends in thirty miles. Farrar’s voice is carved from stone, immovable, half-asleep but never indifferent. He sings like he’s standing in the ruins of the sixties, looking around and muttering, “Guess this is what we’ve got left.” And dammit, what we’ve got left sounds gorgeous.

Trace isn’t alt-country. Alt-country is a marketing gimmick, an excuse for journalists to pretend they’ve discovered a new continent when really they’ve just found the same sad barstools Willie and Merle already angry because they don’t recognize the place. Trace is country with its skin peeled off, electrified and nailed to a telegraph pole. It’s Neil Young after the hangover, it’s Gram Parsons without the messiah complex. It’s the hum of America when the AM station fades out and all you’ve got is static—and suddenly the static is more moving than the song that was playing ever was.

Take “Drown.” Farrar growls it like a prophecy for people already underwater. The guitars crash like waves on cheap levees, the kind that always break. It’s furious and exhausted at the same time, the way you get when you’ve fought too long and realized the fight was fixed from the start. Then there’s “Tear Stained Eye,” where he asks if seeing a river run dry will make you start crying. Spoiler: it won’t. You’ll just stare and keep driving, and that numbness is exactly what Farrar’s documenting—he’s the archivist of our collective shrug.

But here’s the trick, the brilliance: instead of despair, Trace gives you dignity. The dignity of standing in a field that used to be a town, looking at the weeds grow through concrete and saying, “Okay, maybe this is freedom.” Farrar doesn’t want your hope. He wants your honesty. The honesty that says America’s dreams are boarded-up diners and broken jukeboxes, but inside those ruins, a few songs still rattle around like sacred relics.

And maybe that’s why Trace still matters. Because it’s not trying to sell you redemption. It’s not asking you to believe in the comeback of some mythic heartland. It’s just holding up the Polaroid of what’s gone and saying, “Here, take a look. Doesn’t it hurt beautifully?”

In the end, Trace is a ghost road record. It takes you down highways that don’t exist anymore, past radio towers that no longer transmit, through towns that can’t even hold onto their own zip codes. But by the time you get to the last track, you don’t feel lost. You feel found—because someone finally put into music that vague ache you’ve been hauling around, the one you thought was just your private sorrow. Turns out it’s everybody’s sorrow. And Jay Farrar, God bless his gravelly heart, sang it so we could all drive through it together.

The Need for Community and Indie Radio in 2025

In 2025, we’re plugged in, logged on, and supposedly “connected,” but more often than not, we’re trapped in algorithmic echo chambers, scrolling past everything that might actually challenge us or make us feel. Enter indie radio—the last refuge of the real, the unpolished, the alive. Stations that spotlight local bands, spin weird tracks nobody else dares touch, and actually talk to listeners remind us that music isn’t just noise—it’s a social act. Defiance, scored in sound – insurgent spirit.

Shows like ours, Your Tuesday Afternoon Alternative, prove that listening doesn’t have to be lonely. It can be messy, communal, even dangerous in its honesty. Indie radio is where discovery collides with conversation, where culture isn’t handed down in sterile corporate playlists but grown organically, like a basement jam session gone right.

And let’s be blunt: in a media landscape ruled by conglomerates, corporate homogenization, and the soulless chase for clicks, community radio is a lifeline. It champions voices that don’t fit the formula, celebrates the weird, the regional, the overlooked, and keeps local identity breathing while everything else flattens into sameness.

As the noise around us grows louder, the need for authentic closeness grows sharper. Indie radio reminds us that music is a shared experience, conversation is sacred, and community—built on passion, rebellion, and mutual respect—is not optional. It’s essential.

Why the Sad Song Always Hits Harder: A Tear-Streaked Love Letter to Melancholy Music

Let’s talk about sad songs. Not just the ones that make you sniffle politely into your latte or stare wistfully out the bus window like you’re in a Sofia Coppola montage. I mean the real gut-wrenchers. The ones that hit like a tire iron to the heart at 2 a.m., that make you want to lie down in the wreckage of your own teenage angst and just feel things, goddammit. Why do these songs—these elegies in three chords and a cloud of distortion or whispered strings—move us in ways that triumph, joy, or even white-hot rage rarely can?

It’s because melancholy is the one universal that doesn’t require a passport. You don’t have to be fluent in a language, rich, cool, or even particularly literate to feel the weight of a minor chord progression in your bones. It slips through the gaps in your defenses like cigarette smoke under a locked door. Everyone, everywhere, has had their heart broken, or their dreams flicker out like busted neon. And sad songs? They’re the mixtape we make for our ghosts.

And look, I’m not talking about some weepy Ed Sheeran tripe here. I mean the good sad songs. The Big Stars and Elliott Smiths and Billie Holidays of the world. Galaxie 500 staring blankly at the floor through layers of reverb. Nick Drake whispering from inside a velvet-lined coffin. Songs that ache, that bleed, that mean it.

Sad music, real sad music, doesn’t pretend to fix you. It meets you in your pit and pulls up a folding chair. It doesn’t offer a hug so much as sit in the corner, staring into the same void you are, nodding along like, “Yeah, man. It’s messed up. Pass the bottle.” And in that moment, in that terrible mutual silence, there is communion.

Melancholy is Truth in a World of Happy Lies

Let’s face it: most of life is a hustle. A series of grins, resumes, likes, and hollow how-you-doins. Upbeat songs are marketing jingles for this illusion of perpetual sunshine. But sadness? Melancholy doesn’t lie. It doesn’t sell. It just is.

In a world obsessed with productivity and performative optimism—“good vibes only” and “rise and grind” and all that garbage—sad songs are the last rebellion. They remind you it’s okay to break down. That you can’t always be okay. That maybe you’re not the only one dragging a bag of old regrets down a long hallway of wrong turns.

Lester Bangs once said music should be honest, even if it’s ugly. Especially if it’s ugly. And sadness is honest. It’s the realest thing there is. It comes uninvited and leaves when it damn well pleases. And the best artists don’t try to outrun it—they give it a voice. They tune it into something spectral and strange and heartbreakingly beautiful.

It’s in the Sound, Man—That Wound in the Note

Musically, sadness is baked into the DNA. Minor chords, descending progressions, dissonance—it’s a language the body understands instinctively. You don’t think a sad song. You feel it.

Take a piano and slam out a C major. Clean. Uplifting. Now slide that E down to an E-flat. Boom: C minor. Everything changes. That one little shift, and suddenly it’s not a party anymore—it’s a funeral. That’s the thing about music—it doesn’t have to explain itself. The note is the feeling.

And then there’s the delivery. The human voice, trembling at the edge of breaking, is the most honest instrument on Earth. When Nina Simone sang “I Loves You, Porgy,” she wasn’t just performing—she was confessing. When Kurt Cobain howled “I miss you / I’m not gonna crack,” you knew he already had. Sadness in song isn’t neat or polished. It’s raw. Unfiltered. It stumbles through the chorus half-drunk and bleeding.

The best sad songs sound like they barely made it to the end. Like the tape is unraveling, the band is falling apart, the singer might cry or disappear or explode. And that tension? That’s the beauty. It’s art made from the edge.

The Autobiography of a Heartbreak

Every sad song is a memory in search of a body. A soundtrack for the first time you watched someone walk away, or the night you stared at the ceiling wishing you could just hit “off” on your brain. And when a song gets it—when it echoes your exact misery back at you—it feels like it was written just for you, by someone who snuck into your life and took notes.

There’s a strange comfort in that, isn’t there? In knowing someone else has suffered just as deeply, cried just as stupidly, hurt just as foolishly. It’s the one-sided conversation that makes you feel less alone. You don’t even have to reply. Just press play, and bleed.

It’s not just nostalgia—it’s mythologizing your own damn sorrow. The sad song turns your pain into cinema. Suddenly your heartbreak is artistic, your suffering noble. You’re not just sad—you’re part of some great, tragic lineage of sad bastards stretching from Schubert to Phoebe Bridgers. It makes the pain feel important.

We Like Feeling Things (Even the Bad Stuff)

Let’s get perverse for a second: people like sad songs because they want to feel bad. Or more accurately, because they want to feel, period.

In an age of numbing—social media scrolls, medicated serenity, binge distractions—we’re desperate for something real. And sadness, for all its discomfort, is real. It’s proof we’re alive. Listening to a sad song is like picking at a scab: you know it’ll sting, but at least you can feel it.

Bangs would’ve said something like: music is supposed to jolt you out of your dumb meat-puppet routine and make you confront yourself. A sad song is a mirror you can’t look away from. And sometimes we need that. We need to wallow a little, scream into the void, and be broken for three and a half minutes.

There’s an odd sort of euphoria in it, too. A bittersweet ecstasy. Like how crying can feel like a release. Or how Leonard Cohen could make you feel elevated even as he dismantled your soul one verse at a time. Because sadness, in music, is not despair. It’s transcendence through pain. It’s catharsis with a backbeat.

Because Some Beauty Only Exists in the Sadness

There’s a kind of beauty you can only find in sadness. Not in spite of it, but because of it. The cracked voice, the wilted melody, the lyric that says “I’m sorry” without ever using the word—it’s like watching a flower bloom in a war zone. Fragile. Defiant. Weirdly hopeful.

And maybe that’s the secret at the core of it all. Sad songs aren’t just depressing—they’re affirming. They remind you that you’re not alone in the chaos. That your pain is shared, even if no one around you knows what to say. That someone, somewhere, felt exactly this way—and made something beautiful out of it.

It’s that transmutation that makes it powerful. Turning grief into grace. Hurt into harmony. It’s alchemy, man. Pure magic.

The Final Chorus

So why are sad songs so emotionally moving?

Because they mean it. Because they speak when you can’t. Because they let you feel when everything else tells you to shut up and move on. Because they remind you of everything you’ve lost, everything you’ve survived, and everything you still carry.

Because they are the soul, laid bare. A guitar with no filter. A voice with no armor. A truth with no apology.

And let’s be real: nobody ever got goosebumps from a happy song at 3 a.m. Nobody stood in the dark, half-drunk and broken, and put on “Walking on Sunshine.” No. They reached for “Holocaust” by Big Star. For “Between the Bars” by Elliott Smith. For that one Radiohead song that always sounds like winter.

Because sadness, in music, is a kind of salvation. Not escape—but understanding. A sacred ache. A wounded love letter to the worst parts of being human.

And that, friends, is why the sad song always hits harder. Even when—especially when—you don’t want it to.

End Scene. Drop the needle. Cue violins. Fade to silence.

A Night at the Altar of Rock: The Tisburys, Super City, and The Laughing Chimes, and the Resurrection of Everything that Matters

My caffeine-fueled thought about last night’s amazing rock and roll show — By a Lapsed Believer Dragged Kicking and Screaming into Rapture at The Spacebar (May 29, 2025) aka Dr. J.

It started with the silence.

Not the good kind—the pregnant pause before the snare cracks or the breath before a chorus explodes—but the stifling, suffocating kind. The kind that crept in during the pandemic and never fully left. The kind that replaced feedback with buffering wheels, pit sweat with couch inertia, and the sacred communion of the club with the sad, soft glow of your phone or laptop screen.

We all said it was temporary. Just a phase. A pause button. But then people stopped going back. Live music—the lifeblood, the altar, the therapy session-meets-street fight that had once given life to every meaningful moment of youth—was suddenly an option, not a necessity. A niche. A “might”, an “interested” instead of a “must.” Streaming replaced sweat. Earbuds replaced speakers. Watching someone strum a guitar in portrait mode while you folded laundry became the sad parody of what used to be a spiritual act.

And yeah, I bought in. Who didn’t? We got older, softer, more afraid. Netflix kept churning, Spotify never ran dry, and the couch never charged a cover. They had my favorite snacks. Maybe we forgot. Or maybe we chose to forget—because remembering what it was like to feel something, shoulder-to-shoulder with strangers, might have been just too much.

But then, on a random Thursday night in Columbus, Ohio, in a cinderblock joint that still smells like 1994 and regrets, it all came roaring back like a freight train with a grudge. Three bands. A tiny stage. A room. And somewhere in the middle of it all, I found what I didn’t even know I’d lost: the magic.

Maybe we have all been a bit burnt out lately with every morning bringing menace and dread, a thin-skinned attack built on ego, narcissism, and a culture of outrage.

These past few years have felt emotionally scabbed over by years of algorithmic playlists, music discovery if it happens at all is toed strivtly to our personal past choices. And in 2025 so many mainstream limp bands more concerned with brand aesthetics than the beautiful noise of guitar feedback.

Rock and roll has become a ghost in a shaken Polaroid, a relic of denim-scraped memories buried beneath held up poster board ironic mustaches and Instagram filters. The whole thing felt embalmed, pickled, taxidermied—played through boutique pedals and boutique egos, an infinite loop of tasteful mediocrity.

But then came Last Night. One of those nights that swings down from the cosmos like a flaming power chord, grabs you by the lapels, and reminds you why you ever gave a damn in the first place. It happened at The Spacebar in Columbus, Ohio—a cinderblock cathedral tucked between bars, food joints, and a laundromat — the kind of dilapidated storefronts that might still sell VHS tapes or lottery tickets. A venue that smelled of rock and till fightingg for relevance or at least survival. The smell of the grease of good intentions.

The perfect place for resurrection.

Enter Super City.

Super City hit the stage like a lightning bolt fused with a math equation — too tight to be this wild, too wild to be this tight, like if Devo and Thin Lizzy got into a car crash and left the wreckage bleeding glitter and BPMs.

These guys didn’t play songs so much as detonate them, launching off the stage like human fireworks, synchronized like a goddamn robot army but with all the twitchy, unhinged soul of a band that knows every note could be their last. Guitars traded licks like knife-fighters in a Baltimore alley, drums cracked like whips in a circus gone feral, and the whole thing pulsed with that rare, raw urgency—the kind that makes your brain light up and your spine want to sprint straight through the drywall. It was art-damaged rock and roll with a future-funk death wish, a sound so electrified you could taste the ozone in the room.

And hell, the choreography—yes, choreography—but not in some “industry plant showcase” way. No, this was choreography as combat, synchronized movement not to seduce but to bludgeon, to commit to a kinetic madness so complete it looped around into transcendence.

One minute they were locked in like Kraftwerk with heart palpitations, the next they were thrashing their bodies across the stage like the floor was lava and the only salvation was dance. The whole room went from “I don’t know this band” to “I want to join this band” in under three minutes. They didn’t restore your faith in rock and roll—they reminded you that maybe it had evolved into something new, something faster, weirder, sweatier. Something that lives not in the past but right here, right now, sweating all over you in a bar on a Tuesday night like salvation with a tremolo pedal.

And then The Tisburys took the stage.

You ever see a band that walks out looking like maybe they’re just some regular dudes, guys you know, your co-workers at the local record store or your trivia-night competition—and then proceed to absolutely decimate your soul with rock and roll? That’s the Tisburys. They have that thing. The thing you can’t name without sounding like a lunatic or a prophet. The thing that separates the lifers from the LARPers.

From the first note, they tore into their set like a pack of dogs breaking into a butcher shop—joyful chaos, unrelenting passion, the sonic equivalent of smashing glass just to hear the sound. Think Springsteen’s storytelling welded to Big Star’s chiming melancholia, dragged through the gravel of Philly punk grit and splattered with just enough modern neurosis to feel like now. The guitars rang out like church bells for the godless. The rhythm section didn’t just keep time—they commanded it, like Kronos punching the clock with a snarl.

There was one song—title lost to the ecstatic fog of the moment—that built up slow, with this patient, pleading guitar line that felt like someone whispering secrets at the edge of the world. And when it broke? Jesus. It was like the roof lifted six inches and the universe cracked open just wide enough for all of us—sweaty, cynical, slack-jawed—to catch a glimpse of what music is for.

The Laughing Chimes.

Two minutes into their set, I was already sweating through my cynicism. These kids (and yes, kids—the kind that probably still think Hüsker Dü is a weird Scandinavian joke until they learn better) came out swinging with jangle-pop hooks like they’d just stumbled out of a time portal from Athens, Georgia, circa 1985, blinking into the fluorescence with nothing but Rickenbackers and righteous intention. There was no ironic detachment, no arch knowingness—just melodies sharp enough to slice through the smog of apathy I’d been inhaling since 2016.

They played like they meant it. You know what that means? Probably not. Because meaning it is a lost art. Meaning it is standing in front of twenty-something beer-slingers and 40-year-olds wearing Dinosaur Jr. shirts with a rhythm section that gallops like a dog finally let off the leash and singing about small towns, lost dreams, and heartbreaks that aren’t filtered through TikTok.

I felt young. Not “young” like your skincare ad says—you know, dewy and delusional—but young like: I want to start a band tonight and scream into a microphone until the cops come.

By the time The Laughing Chimes slashed through their final number—a feedback-drenched love letter to the Replacements that made me want to punch the air and cry at the same time—I was halfway converted. I could feel the old hunger stirring, the one that used to wake me up at 2 a.m. with a desperate need to play “Radio Free Europe” at bone-rattling volume.

Not money. Not TikTok virality. Not Spotify streams.

Connection. Defiance. Salvation.

And it wasn’t just the bands. It was us, the crowd—pressed together marinated in secondhand dreams, all there for the same unspoken purpose. To feel something real. I saw a guy in a vintage Guided by Voices tee taking it in like a benediction. I saw a girl lean her head on her girlfriend’s shoulder during a bridge that could have melted glaciers. I saw the bartender nodding along in the back like they’d forgotten they were on the clock. Magic. Not sleight-of-hand, not showbiz gloss—but ancient, electric, and utterly earned.

By the end, I was a puddle. Broken down and rebuilt by the raw, gorgeous power of three bands who didn’t need a light show or viral video to get through to me—just guts, melody, and an unshakable belief in the redemptive fire of a great song, played loud, in a room too small to contain it.

I walked out into the Columbus night buzzing like a man struck by divine lightning. My ears rang with the ghost-echoes of feedback and harmony. My body ached in that holy way, the kind you feel after love, surviving a riot, or finally remembering who the hell you are if even for a fleeting moment.

Rock and roll isn’t dead. It’s just waiting for you at a place like The Spacebar, on a night like that, where belief is possible again. Super City, The Tisburys and The Laughing Chimes didn’t just play a show.

They started a revival.