Or in true Rocky and Bullwinkle, subtitle form:
Why criticism has made me a better radio DJ—and a better listener.

There is a peculiar vulnerability that comes with opening a microphone every Tuesday afternoon.
For three hours, I invite complete strangers into my musical world. I ask them to trust me enough to follow a trail that might begin with a jangly indie band from Dayton, wander through Americana, stop briefly for a forgotten punk single from 1979, and somehow arrive at a songwriter whose latest album has only a few hundred streams.
Sometimes the journey makes perfect sense. Sometimes it resembles someone spilling an entire record collection down a flight of stairs.
That’s live radio.
After more than four decades behind microphones at four different stations—and more than twenty years hosting Your Tuesday Afternoon Alternative on WUDR—I’ve learned something that took me much longer than it should have.
People aren’t really criticizing the music.
They’re telling you something about themselves.
One listener wonders why I played that song. Another wishes I’d feature more local music. Someone else thinks the show has become too eclectic, while another insists it isn’t eclectic enough. One person loves hearing deep album cuts; another just wants songs they recognize. If I post too often on social media, someone notices. If I don’t post enough, someone notices that too.
In my day job as a prof of sociology, we spend a lot of time thinking about perspective. Music reminds me every week that perspective isn’t just an academic concept. It’s deeply personal.
Every listener arrives carrying an invisible soundtrack.
Their first concert. The song that got them through divorce. The album they shared with their father. The band they discovered in college that convinced them life could be larger than their hometown. A song or an album or a band that changed their life.
No wonder people feel strongly.

Music has never been merely entertainment.
It’s autobiography set to melody. That gradual realization has slowly changed how I hear criticism.
Early on, I sometimes took it personally. I wondered whether I’d chosen poorly or somehow failed the audience. But radio has a remarkable way of sanding down your ego. You miss a cue. You mispronounce an artist’s name. You accidentally leave the microphone on while shuffling papers. You introduce the wrong song. You post something on social media that could have been written more clearly or more thoughtfully.
Live radio has an excellent memory. And so does the internet.
The temptation is to become defensive. To explain yourself. To remind everyone that producing three hours of live radio every week involves juggling playlists, interviews, engineering, timing, software, breaking music news, community events, and trying to sound like you’re not simultaneously wondering whether you remembered to turn off the coffee pot before leaving the house.
But explanations rarely build community.
Listening does.
One of my favorite observations about radio comes from legendary broadcaster John Peel, who believed a DJ should surprise listeners, not simply reassure them. His programs became famous because he trusted audiences enough to let them discover music they didn’t yet know they loved.
I’ve always admired that philosophy.
Not because I think every song I choose deserves universal praise. Far from it. Some songs simply don’t connect. Some artists I become excited about fade away. Others I overlooked become favorites years later.
Curiosity requires humility.
And humility means accepting that you won’t always get it right — And that is a hard fact to accept.
Years ago, I wrote that if even one person found comfort in a song, then the show mattered. I still believe that. In fact, I believe it more deeply now than when I first wrote those words.
But I’ve also come to appreciate the other side of that equation. If someone tells me a transition felt awkward, maybe it did.
If they point out that I interrupted a guest too quickly, I should think about that.
If they wish I spent more time letting the music breathe instead of talking over an introduction, perhaps they’re hearing something I missed.
Not every criticism is correct. Neither is every compliment. The challenge is learning which voices help you become the person—and broadcaster—you hope to be.
This isn’t easy.
Social media encourages certainty. Radio rewards confidence. Neither naturally encourages reflection. Yet reflection may be the most important skill a broadcaster can cultivate.
After every show I hear the things no one else probably noticed. The sentence I stumbled over. The interview question I wish I’d asked differently. The local band I forgot to mention.
The moment I rushed because I glanced at the clock instead of trusting the conversation.
These aren’t failures. They’re tomorrow’s lesson plan.
Lester Bangs once wrote about rock and roll as though every record might save civilization or accidentally set the amplifier on fire trying. That’s probably the right amount of drama for radio too.
Every Tuesday I still believe the next song could change someone’s afternoon. Maybe not their life. But perhaps their day. Maybe they’ll pull into their driveway and sit in the car for another three minutes because they need to hear how the song ends.
That’s enough.
What I’ve learned is that radio isn’t really about proving your taste. It’s about sharing your enthusiasm generously enough that other people feel invited into it.
The older I get, the less interested I am in winning arguments about music. I’d rather introduce someone to a band they’ve never heard before. I’d rather give a Dayton musician their first interview. I’d rather make room for voices that commercial radio has forgotten.
I’ve often said that “support your local music scene” isn’t just a slogan. It’s a philosophy. Supporting musicians means showing up, buying records, paying cover charges, telling friends about great bands, and creating spaces where artists can be heard. Radio is one small part of a larger ecosystem.
The funny thing is that criticism has become part of that ecosystem too. It reminds me that people are listening carefully or reading passionately enough to care. That’s a privilege.
I still make mistakes.
I always will.
I’ll occasionally hit the wrong button, misidentify an album, write a social media post that could have been more thoughtful, or discover that what sounded brilliant in my head landed somewhere closer to “well, that was awkward.”
Good. Because perfection has never made memorable radio.
Human beings, well at this radio station anyway, make memorable radio. The slight hesitation before introducing a favorite song. The laugh when something unexpectedly goes wrong.
The excitement of hearing a new artist who reminds you why you fell in love with music in the first place.
Those moments can’t be automated. They can’t be programmed. At least it is hard to create perfect mistakes. And they certainly can’t be focus-grouped.
They simply happen because another imperfect human being is sitting behind a microphone trying to connect one song—and one listener—to another. Sure, voice tracking and the other computerized soulless efforts strive for that ‘sounds real effect’ but it misses the mark in ways we can all tell when listening.
Every Tuesday afternoon I still hope I can do the show a little better than I did the week before. Not because criticism tells me I’m failing. Rather because listening—to music, to musicians, and sometimes to the people who disagree with me—reminds me that learning never stops.
Maybe that’s the real job of a radio DJ. Not simply to play songs. But to keep listening.


















