Rob Hirst performs with Midnight Oil in 1988 at the Tower Theater in Philadelphia. (Bill McCay / Getty Images)
Rock music has always been good at noise. What it has been less reliable at—though never incapable of—is meaning. That is why the passing of Rob Hirst from Midnight Oil lands with a particular weight. It is not only the loss of a musician, but the loss of someone who helped prove that rock and roll could still function as a moral instrument without becoming preachy, hollow, or self-satisfied.
Midnight Oil was never just a band you put on in the background. Their music demanded attention. It asked listeners to sit up straighter, to think harder, to consider their place in a world shaped by power, inequality, and history. Rob was part of that engine—part of the collective force that turned urgency into sound and commitment into motion.
To understand why this matters, it helps to remember what Midnight Oil represented in the broader history of popular music. By the late 1970s and early 1980s, rock was splintering. Punk had stripped things down to raw confrontation. Arena rock had blown things up into a spectacle. New wave flirted with irony. Somewhere in that mix, Midnight Oil arrived with a different proposition: that rock could be loud and political, muscular and ethical, uncompromising without losing its humanity.
Rob’s contribution to that vision was not flashy. That is precisely the point. The band’s power never came from virtuosity for its own sake. It came from restraint, discipline, and a sense that every note existed in service of something larger than individual ego. This was rock music as collective labor—tight, propulsive, and purposeful. Think of this as where cultural significance often gets overlooked. We tend to focus on front figures, lyricists, or visible symbols of protest. But movements—musical or political—are sustained by people who show up consistently, shape the structure, and hold the center. Rob helped hold that center. The music moved because it was grounded.
That grounding mattered because Midnight Oil treated politics not as branding but as responsibility. Their songs did not offer vague calls to “change the world.” They named systems. They pointed to consequences. They located listeners inside histories of colonialism, environmental destruction, and economic exploitation. This was not background protest—it was confrontation set to a beat you could not ignore.
Yet what made Rob and the band enduring was that the music never collapsed into scolding. There was anger, yes, but also care. There was urgency, but also solidarity. The sound invited people in even as it challenged them. That balance—between confrontation and connection—is rare, and it is one reason the band still resonates across generations.
From an academic perspective, Midnight Oil complicates the idea that popular music must choose between mass appeal and political seriousness. Their success suggests something else: that audiences are often more capable of engaging complex ideas than the industry assumes. Rob’s work helped demonstrate that rhythm itself can carry ethical weight, that repetition can reinforce not just hooks but commitments.
There is also something important about how Midnight Oil aged. Many politically minded bands burn bright and disappear, their relevance trapped in a specific historical moment. But the Oil’s music did not rely on trend or novelty. Its concerns—land, labor, justice, responsibility—remain unresolved. In that sense, Rob’s legacy is not nostalgic. It is unfinished.
Loss sharpens this realization. When someone like Rob passes, we are reminded that cultural work is always temporary, even when its impact is not. The people who make the music eventually leave us. What remains is the sound—and the question of what we do with it.
For listeners, the answer is not just remembrance. It is continuation. To keep playing the records, yes—but also to keep asking the questions the music raised. To refuse the comfortable separation between art and action. To remember that rock and roll, at its best, has never been about escape alone. It has also been about attention. Rob’s life and work stand as a quiet rebuke to cynicism. At a time when political engagement is often reduced to slogans and aesthetics, Midnight Oil insisted on substance. Rob helped give that insistence a pulse. A beat that did not rush. A rhythm that held steady while the world lurched.
In the end, that may be the most fitting way to understand his contribution. Rob was part of a band that believed sound could still carry responsibility—and he helped make that belief audible. His passing is a loss. But the music remains, still insistent, still unresolved, still asking us to listen harder than we might prefer.
And that, in rock and roll terms, is about as real as it gets.
Some cities hum, and some cities grind, and then there’s Dayton, Ohio, which does both at once, like it’s chewing aluminum foil and smiling through the sparks. Out of that glorious Midwestern feedback loop comes Todd The Fox—musician, songwriter, performer, singer—padding into your ears tomorrow on Your Tuesday Afternoon Alternative from 4–5 p.m. Eastern, impeccably dressed as if from a nineteenth-century sepia-toned picture, eyes bright, ready to knock over your preconceptions and maybe a lamp or two. This isn’t a press-release animal. This is the kind of musician who lives in the alley behind the club and somehow knows your name and the story of how you met.
Let’s get something straight before the bio-police arrive with their clipboards: Todd The Fox isn’t a “local act” the way people say “local” when they mean “small.” Dayton has always been a factory for nervous systems—Guided by Voices turning beer-soaked basements into libraries of genius, the Breeders bending melody until it smiles back, far too many funk ghosts rattling the windows to mention them all. Todd The Fox comes from that lineage of people who treat songs like living organisms, not products. The music breathes. It snarls. It slips between rock and roll styles the way a fox slips under a fence: quick, quiet, leaving you wondering how it got there and beautiful.
Listen closely, and you hear a songwriter who understands the dirty miracle of rockabilly, rock ‘n’ roll, juke joint, rock AND roll, pop, and more—how a hook can feel like salvation if you let it—and who also understands how to break the hook on purpose just to see what bleeds out. Todd’s songs don’t ask permission. They don’t knock. They kick the door, apologize sincerely, then steal your favorite record and give it back with new fingerprints. There’s classic melody here, yes, but it’s the kind that’s been roughed up by real nights and real mornings, the kind that knows the difference between romance and survival.
Performance-wise, Todd The Fox doesn’t “take the stage” so much as make it a living room and then light a match. There’s a physical intelligence to it, a sense that the body is another instrument and the crowd is a choir that doesn’t know it’s rehearsing. You don’t watch so much as get pulled into orbit. To call him a showman would truly understate it. That’s the secret sauce: the generosity. Even when the songs bite, they’re offered with an open palm. You’re invited to bleed a little, too. It’s communion with better jokes.
And here’s the thing the algorithms won’t tell you: Todd The Fox understands time. Not in the “retro” sense—this isn’t cosplay—but in the way great rock & roll always has, a kind of temporal vandalism. The performance of the songs feels like they all could’ve been written yesterday or twenty years from now, which is to say they live in the only time that matters: the one where you’re paying attention. There’s craft without fussiness, ambition without the TED Talk, and a willingness to leave the seams showing because that’s where the electricity leaks out.
Tomorrow’s hour on Your Tuesday Afternoon Alternative isn’t a content drop; it’s a rendezvous. Radio still matters when it’s alive, when it’s a room you can step into and feel the air change. From 4–5 p.m. Eastern, Todd The Fox comes by to talk shop, spin yarns, and let the music do what it does best: make a mess and call it truth. Expect stories that zig when you think they’ll zag, expect songs that refuse to sit still, expect the kind of conversation that remembers radio is a human act, not a playlist with a personality disorder.
If you’re tired of music that arrives pre-chewed, if you miss the feeling that something might go wrong in the best possible way, tune in. Todd The Fox is the sound of a city, of a tradition that learned how to survive by inventing its own fun, the sound of a songwriter who trusts the song more than the strategy. There’s wit here, and bite, and that elusive thing critics pretend to quantify: soul. Not the museum kind. The living, twitching kind that looks you in the eye and dares you to stay.
So set the dial. Clear the hour. Let the fox into the henhouse of your afternoon and see what survives. Tomorrow, 4–5 p.m. Eastern. Your Tuesday Afternoon Alternative. This is how radio remembers what it’s for.
How often have you been asked to name your top ten albums, or debated which records you’d take to a desert island? The “desert island album” is a familiar, hypothetical concept among music fans: the one record you could listen to endlessly and never tire of. It’s simply a way of naming your most cherished, all-time favorite album. For Dr. J, one of those perfect records is Counting Crows’ 1993 debut, August and Everything After.
Some records arrive like polite guests, shaking hands with the radio, smiling for the cameras, making sure not to spill anything on the carpet. And then some records kick in the door at 3 a.m., overwhelmed on their own feelings, bleeding a little, asking you if you’ve ever actually lived or if you’ve just been killing time until something breaks your heart. August and Everything After is the latter. It doesn’t so much introduce Counting Crows as it announces them, like a cracked-voiced preacher stumbling into town with a suitcase full of secrets and a head full of weather. That it’s their first record feels almost obscene. Bands aren’t supposed to sound this fully formed, this bruised, this emotionally articulate right out of the gate. This is supposed to take years of failure, challenges, and ill-advised love affairs. But here it is, fully alive, staring you down.
If genius means anything in rock and roll—and it does, despite all the sneering irony we’re trained to wear like armor—it means the ability to translate private confusion into public communion. Adam Duritz doesn’t just write songs; he writes confessions that somehow feel like yours, even when you’ve never lived in California, never stood on a street corner at night wondering who you were supposed to be, never tried to make sense of love after it’s already gone feral and bitten you. These songs don’t explain feelings; they inhabit them. They sit in the mess. They let the awkward silences linger. They don’t clean up after themselves. And that’s why people keep coming back.
“Round Here” opens the album not with a bang but with a question mark. It’s a song about dislocation, about being young enough to believe that identity is something you can find if you just look hard enough, and old enough to know that it might already be slipping away. “She says she’s tired of life, she must be tired of something,” Duritz sings, and it’s not melodrama—it’s reportage. He’s documenting the emotional static of a generation that grew up on promises it didn’t quite believe. There’s no manifesto here, no slogans. Just the sound of someone pacing around a parking lot trying to figure out how to be real in a world that feels increasingly wrong and staged.
And that’s the trick of August and Everything After: it sounds intimate without being precious, expansive without being bombastic. The band plays like they’re backing a nervous breakdown that somehow learned how to swing. The guitars shimmer and sigh; the rhythm section keeps things grounded, like a friend who knows when to let you rant and when to hand you a glass of water. T Bone Burnett’s production (Burnett also contributed guitar and vocals to the record) gives everything room to breathe, which is crucial because these songs need the oxygen. Smother them, and they’d collapse into self-pity. Instead, they hover in that dangerous space between vulnerability and confidence, where the best rock records live.
“Omaha” — one of my favorite songs on the record — is where the album first threatens to explode. It’s restless, jittery, propelled by a sense that staying still is a kind of death. Duritz sounds like someone running not toward something but away from the version of himself he’s afraid to become. This is a recurring theme throughout the record: movement as salvation, travel as therapy, geography as a stand-in for emotional states. Cities become characters, roads become metaphors, and every mile marker is another chance to start over, or at least pretend you can.
Then there’s “Mr. Jones,” the song that doomed the band to a lifetime of misunderstanding by becoming a hit. People heard it as an anthem of ambition, a singalong about wanting to be famous, to be seen. But listen closer, and it’s a song about emptiness, about mistaking visibility for connection. “We all want to be big stars,” Duritz sings, and it’s not triumph—it’s confession. The song pulses with the anxiety of someone who knows that being watched isn’t the same as being known. That radio stations turned it into a party song is almost beside the point; the genius is that it works despite the misreading, smuggling existential dread onto pop playlists like contraband.
The middle stretch of the album is where August and Everything After really earns its indispensability. “Perfect Blue Buildings” and “Anna Begins” slow things down, letting the emotional weight settle in your chest. These are songs about relationships not as fairy tales but as negotiations, as ongoing attempts to be less alone without losing yourself entirely. “Anna Begins” in particular feels like eavesdropping on someone thinking out loud, trying to talk himself into love and out of fear at the same time. It’s hesitant, messy, human. The song doesn’t resolve so much as it exhales, which is exactly right. Love rarely comes with neat conclusions. And remember, this is the band’s first record — wow.
What makes this record one that everyone has either owned, borrowed, stolen, or at least absorbed through cultural osmosis is how unapologetically it centers feeling in an era that was increasingly suspicious of it. The early ’90s had irony for days. Grunge made disaffection fashionable; alternative radio thrived on detachment. Counting Crows, meanwhile, walked in waving their emotions like a white flag and dared you to flinch. They didn’t hide behind distortion or sarcasm. They sang about longing, loneliness, and the aching desire to matter. And people listened because, beneath all the posturing, that’s what everyone was dealing with anyway.
“Time and Time Again” and “Rain King” push the album toward something almost mythic. Duritz begins to sound less like a diarist and more like a prophet with stage fright, evoking imagery that feels both biblical and personal at the same time. “Rain King” is particularly a masterclass in building atmosphere. It swells and recedes, gathering momentum until it feels like the sky might actually open up. It’s about control and surrender, about wanting to command the elements of your life while knowing that you’re mostly at their mercy. It’s the sound of someone learning to live with uncertainty rather than trying to conquer it.
And then there’s “A Murder of One,” the closer that doesn’t tie things up so much as leave them humming in your bloodstream. It’s expansive, reflective, tinged with regret but not crushed by it. Ending the album here feels intentional: after all the searching, all the restless motion, the record concludes not with answers but with a kind of hard-won acceptance. Life is complicated. Love is risky. Identity is a moving target. The best you can do is keep singing, keep reaching out, keep trying to make sense of the mess.
What’s staggering is that this is a debut. Not a tentative first step, not a collection of demos dressed up for release, but a fully realized statement of purpose. Counting Crows sound like a band that already knows who they are, even as their songs wrestle with uncertainty. That tension—between confidence and doubt, polish and rawness—is what gives August and Everything After its staying power. It feels lived-in, like these songs existed long before they were recorded, waiting for the right moment to surface.
In the end, the genius of August and Everything After isn’t just in its songwriting or performances, though both are exceptional. It’s in its insistence that emotional honesty is a form of rebellion. That talking about loneliness, about the hunger for connection, about the struggle to define yourself in a world that keeps changing the rules—that all of this matters. This is a record that people return to at different stages of their lives and hear something new each time, because it grows with you. Or maybe it just reminds you of who you were when you first heard it, and who you thought you might become.
Either way, it’s indispensable. Not because it tells you what to feel, but because it reminds you that feeling deeply is still possible. And for a debut album to pull that off—to make itself a permanent fixture in the emotional furniture of rock and roll—that’s not just impressive. That’s a small miracle, wrapped in August light and delivered just in time.
It’s 2026, and if someone tells you that the gatekeepers have vanished, they’re half right — because the old ones never really left, and the new ones are algorithms you can’t talk to over a beer. But out here in the dust-soaked landscape where indie music still breathes, artists are inventing their own economies, building their own tribes, and sustaining entire careers without waving to Spotify’s backstage bouncer. This is the story of the new DIY pipeline — where radical drive, community, and patronage outshine cold, digital playlists.
Let’s start with a truth that should be shouted from every rooftop: you don’t need a major label to be heard anymore — you just need someone who’ll listen.That’s both terrifying and beautiful, especially when artists like Hello June come along and remind you why indie music is still worth the trouble. You might know Hello June as the West Virginia-rooted outfit whose reverb-soaked guitars and poetic introspection make a perfect late-night soundtrack to driving somewhere you shouldn’t be. Their songs, like “Mars” and “Honey I Promise,” shimmer with emotional clarity — the kind of music that makes you feel seen in the dark. Critics from Paste to NPR Music cited them early on, and they’ve carved a lane in the hearts of listeners without a “Major” label deal ever steering their ship.
Meanwhile, from the Midwest — not far from our own Dayton scene — artists like Beth Bombara have spent years building careers outside the corporate churn. Bombara, originally from Grand Rapids, relocated to St. Louis, Missouri, in 2007, where she became a prominent figure in the city’s Americana and roots music scene, blending folk and indie rock with a strong work ethic and a distinctive sound. She funded her first full-length in 2010 with Kickstarter and has since navigated life as a working artist armed with nothing more than her incredible voice, her evocative guitar, and her fans’ belief.
These are not anomalies — they’re the new normal.
The digital era promised democratization, but what we actually got was decentralization: power pulled out of a few hands and spread across millions of screens. No longer is the major label the only entity that can bankroll an album, book tours, or create community. Instead, bands, solo musicians, and writers are turning to platforms that were once footnotes in industry thinkpieces — places like Patreon, Bandcamp, Discord, and direct mailing lists, among other creative tools of communication.
So what’s the deal with Patreon? First co-invented by musician Jack Conte as a direct lifeline between artist and audience, Patreon operates on a simple but subversive idea: fans will pay if what you make matters to them — not just as background noise, but as something alive in their lives.
At its core, Patreon is a membership platform where a listener can become a patron — literally a supporter — of an artist they believe in. This isn’t an iTunes download or a Spotify stream; it’s ongoing support. The model flips the script: instead of chasing playlist placements and algorithm boosts, musicians offer exclusive content, early access to songs, behind-the-scenes videos, and even livestreams of rehearsals or songwriting sessions. It’s the 21st-century version of knocking on your favorite artist’s green room door after a show, but without the awkwardness and with a monthly subscription.
Let’s take Amanda Palmer as an example — not because she’s the only one doing it, but because she made it look possible for everyone. Palmer is a prominent example of an artist bypassing traditional music industry structures, having pioneered a sustainable career through direct-to-fan crowdfunding and patronage. Her success with Patreon, which at times saw her supported by over 11,000 patrons for her content, highlights a shift toward, and the viability of, an independent, community-funded model. With thousands of patrons, she has funded entire projects, released music on her own terms, and keeps her creative life spinning outside the corporate wheelhouse. Palmer’s success proves that authentic connection beats algorithmic luck every time.
Amanda Palmer isn’t alone — she’s just the loudest proof of concept. Once the door cracked open, a lot of artists realized they didn’t need permission anymore.
Take Pomplamoose, for instance. Jack Conte and Nataly Dawn didn’t just use Patreon — Conte co-built it after realizing that viral success on YouTube didn’t equal financial stability. Pomplamoose flipped the script by inviting fans into the process: behind-the-scenes videos, early releases, and transparent explanations of how music actually gets made and paid for. Their Patreon isn’t about mystique; it’s about trust. Fans know where their money goes, and in return, the band keeps control of its sound, schedule, and sanity.
Then there’s Jonathan Coulton, a cult hero long before “crowdfunding” became a buzzword. Coulton built his career through mailing lists, web releases, and fan support years before Patreon existed. When he later embraced patronage platforms, it felt less like a pivot and more like a natural extension of a relationship he’d already cultivated. His success reminds us that this model isn’t about tech — it’s about consistency and connection.
Erin McKeown offers another blueprint. A fiercely independent songwriter with a restless creative streak, McKeown has used Patreon to support not just albums but experimentation itself — new sounds, collaborations, and political engagement. Patrons aren’t just buying songs; they’re underwriting artistic freedom. That’s the real revolution here: the ability to fail, explore, and grow without a label hovering over your shoulder asking about “marketability.”
In the indie-folk and Americana world, artists like Dessa have also leaned into direct support. Through Patreon and direct fan engagement, Dessa has funded releases, tours, and multimedia projects while maintaining ownership of her work and her narrative. What stands out is how these artists talk to their supporters — not as consumers, but as collaborators in a shared cultural project.
Even younger, genre-blurring artists have taken notice. Jacob Collier turned his Patreon into a living room — a place for listening parties, deep musical nerdery, and real-time feedback from fans who care about chord changes and time signatures. It’s not mass culture; it’s micro-culture. And that’s exactly the point. Collier reimagined his Patreon into a hub for superfans: album recommendations, Zoom “hangs,” and listening parties — experiences you can’t get anywhere else.
What ties all of these artists together isn’t genre, fame level, or even platform — it’s a shared refusal to treat listeners like anonymous clicks. In each case, Patreon becomes less of a paywall and more of a campfire: a place where artists explain what they’re doing, why it matters, and how supporters are part of it.
This model scales down beautifully, too. The same logic that sustains Amanda Palmer or Pomplamoose works for regional and DIY artists — including those orbiting scenes like Dayton’s. An artist doesn’t need 11,000 patrons; sometimes 100 deeply invested listeners are enough to fund a record, press vinyl, or take a tour without going broke. That’s the quiet power of the system.
What all of this proves — over and over — is that authentic connection beats algorithmic luck every time. Algorithms reward sameness and volume. Communities reward honesty, risk, and presence. Patreon didn’t invent that truth — it just gave it a payment button. And once artists realized they could build sustainable lives by talking with their audiences instead of shouting at them, there was no going back.
Now take a beat and imagine that same mentality applied locally: imagine Dayton-area artists building scenes not by random algorithmic chance, but by actual conversation. Bands like The Nautical Theme, whose work has caught attention around the region and beyond — a duo with rich lyricism and intimate sound — are the perfect candidates for this kind of direct support model.
Instead of waiting for a mysterious playlist curator to decide whether they “fit,” these artists can launch a Patreon and say: “Here’s our new track before anyone else hears it.” “Here’s a video of us working through this melody.” “Here’s a Q&A or a private live chat.”
And the fans — the listeners who feel like family — respond.
This approach is not without its skeptics. Some fans grumble that putting music behind a paywall feels transactional, a betrayal of the free-streaming age. Others worry that Patreon can become a grind: you owe monthly content, you owe engagement, you owe something beyond the music itself. That criticism isn’t wrong — but it’s missing the bigger picture: Patreon isn’t about hiding your art, it’s about valuing your art.
Because here’s a fact nobody will whisper: streaming services pay ‘peanuts.’ Artists make fractions of pennies, and touring income can evaporate overnight (as COVID taught us). Patreon isn’t a silver bullet, but it gives back the dignity of direct support — something that crowdfunding pioneers like Bombara were already practicing a decade ago with Kickstarter.
And so we come full circle. This new DIY pipeline isn’t about rejection of platforms like Spotify or Apple Music — they still matter — it’s about not depending on them exclusively. It’s about deepening the relationship between artist and audience, and about building sustainable careers outside traditional structures.
You can see this new ecosystem everywhere you look:
Exclusive releases on Bandcamp that let fans pay more than the minimum — paying what they want to support the artist directly;
Patreon communities that reward superfans with behind-the-scenes access;
Local scenes where bands exchange audiences and cross-promote shows;
And yes, tiny micro-labels started by fans that release cassette tapes because who says they can’t?
It resembles the old punk DIY ethos as much as it does the post-internet world: make your art, find your people, and don’t wait for permission. Leave the algorithms to sort cookies — the real thing happens where hearts beat, and feet stomp at house shows, where fans feel like participants instead of data points.
Maybe there’s something inherently human about all this — after all, music has always been about connection. Whether it was someone handing you a mixtape in the ‘90s, a friend whispering about a local band at a bar, or a Patreon post that makes you feel like you’re part of the creative process — that’s what sustains music. Not corporate endorsements. Not algorithmic pushes. People who feel something choose to support something real.
And in 2026, that might just be the most radical thing of all.
Mike Bankhead’s “Something That I Can’t Explain” doesn’t so much begin as it leaks out of the speakers, a humid, half-remembered confession that carries a feeling from basements, barroom carpets, and the ghost of every rehearsal space Dayton ever forced into existence. You don’t listen to this song so much as you wander into it, like opening the wrong door in a familiar house and finding a room you forgot was there. That’s Bankhead’s trick: he makes the local feel mythic and the mythic feel like it’s leaning against a busted amp, waiting for the others to arrive.
Dayton has always been one of America’s great under-credited noise factories, and yup, I am ready to die on that hill. We gave the world funk, post-punk, industrial weirdness, and enough basement-bred genius to stock a dozen glossy documentaries that will never get made. Mike Bankhead sits right in the middle of that lineage—not as a tourist or a revivalist, but as a lifer. He’s one of those musicians who doesn’t just play in a scene; he is part of its circulatory system, hauling gear, showing up for other people’s gigs, recording, mixing, encouraging, needling, and generally making sure the whole messy organism keeps breathing. Every scene needs someone like Mike, part fan, part musician, part reminder of the reasons people do this.
“Something That I Can’t Explain” sounds like it was written by someone who’s been around long enough to know that the best songs aren’t about clarity; they’re about staying with the confusion. Sometimes the grey area matters more than the easy answers. The melody lurches forward like it’s got something urgent to tell you and then second-guesses itself halfway through the sentence. The vocals don’t demand your attention—they sidle up to it, muttering truths they’re not totally sure they’re allowed to say. This is not stadium rock. This is backroom metaphysics.
What makes Bankhead essential to Dayton isn’t just that he writes songs like this; it’s that he’s helped create the conditions where songs like this can exist at all. Scenes don’t survive on big breaks. They survive on people who show up. Bankhead has been one of those gravitational figures who make it easier for others, strangers, and the less confident artists to take the leap. When someone tells you, “Yeah, Mike’s involved,” you know it means things will actually happen—records will get finished, shows will get booked, weird ideas will be taken seriously instead of laughed out of the room.
There’s a Dayton-specific emotional weather system in “Something That I Can’t Explain.” It’s in the way the song refuses to resolve cleanly, the way it keeps circling a feeling instead of pinning it down. Dayton’s a town that’s been promised a lot and delivered just enough to keep hoping. Bankhead understands that tension, and he doesn’t try to smooth it over. He lets it hum, like feedback you don’t quite know how to kill without losing the song.
Lester Bangs used to say that the best rock and roll made you feel less alone in your own weirdness. Bankhead does that, but he does it with a Dayton accent—gritty, affectionate, slightly suspicious of success, deeply loyal to the people who were there before anyone else cared. “Something That I Can’t Explain” isn’t just a song; it’s a little flare shot up from a city that keeps reinventing itself in basements and back rooms. And Mike Bankhead, bless him, keeps striking the matches.
They keep saying it like it’s a diagnosis, like a doctor lowering his voice: There’s no good new music anymore. As if the patient is culture itself, lying flatlined under a white sheet, while the rest of us are supposed to nod solemnly and accept that the last real song was written sometime around when they were sixteen and emotionally combustible. This is nonsense, of course, the laziest kind of nonsense, the kind that requires no listening, no leaving the house, no risk, no sweat, no awkward eye contact in a half-lit room where the band is setting up next to a stack of amps that smell like beer, ozone, and promise.
New music is not dead. It’s just not coming to you. It’s not ringing your doorbell or algorithmically tucking itself into your ears while you scroll. It’s happening out there, in rooms that require pants and presence and a willingness to be changed, even slightly. And that’s the real problem: new music demands participation. It demands that you show up.
The great (boy, would he hate that sentiment) rock critic, Lester Bangs, understood this instinctively. He knew that music wasn’t an artifact to be archived, but a live wire, something that crackles when bodies gather, and sound hits air, and something unpredictable happens. The excitement of new music isn’t about novelty for novelty’s sake; it’s about the shock of recognition when you hear something you didn’t know you needed until it’s already inside your head, rearranging the furniture.
Going out to see local music—real local music, not brand-approved “scenes” packaged for export—is a civic act. It’s how communities remember they’re alive. You walk into a bar, a VFW hall, a coffee shop after hours, a basement with questionable wiring, and suddenly you’re part of a temporary republic founded on volume and intent. You’re standing next to people who live where you live, who work the jobs you know, who are writing songs not because it will scale, but because it has to come out. That matters. That changes things.
The need for new music isn’t abstract. It’s psychic. It’s the need to hear someone else articulate the same confusion, joy, dread, or stubborn hope you’re carrying around without a language. No documentation, just a real human need. When people say nothing is exciting being made anymore, what they’re really saying is that they’ve stopped being curious about other people’s interior lives. They want the old songs because the old songs already agree with them. New music argues back, it’s the packaging/re-packaging of human feelings in new bottles.
And that argument is healthy. It keeps culture from calcifying into a museum gift shop stocked with endlessly remastered memories. Live local music reminds us that art is a process, not a product. Bands miss notes. Lyrics change. Drummers (guitarists, bass players, etc.) quit. Someone forgets the bridge and laughs. These imperfections are not flaws; they’re evidence of life. They’re proof that the thing you’re witnessing hasn’t been fully decided yet.
The positive consequences ripple outward. You support a venue, which supports staff, which keeps a place open where people can gather without a screen between them. You give musicians a reason to keep writing, to keep rehearsing, to keep believing that the hours spent hauling gear and arguing about tempos aren’t insane. You create informal networks—musicians meet other musicians, shows lead to collaborations, friendships form, ideas cross-pollinate. This is how scenes happen, not because someone declares one into existence, but because enough people decide that showing up matters.
Local music also recalibrates your sense of scale. Not everything needs to be monumental to be meaningful. A great song played for forty people can hit harder than a festival set swallowed by branding and distance. There’s an intimacy in local shows that can’t be replicated: eye contact with the singer, the thump of the kick drum in your sternum, the shared glance when a chorus lands just right. You don’t leave as a consumer; you leave as a witness to something that you cannot quite describe.
And let’s be honest about the frustration. The claim that nothing compelling is being released now is often a cover for disengagement. It’s easier to blame the times than to admit you’ve stopped listening actively. The world didn’t run out of ideas; you ran out of patience. Meanwhile, musicians are still out here folding genres into new shapes, writing songs about now—about precarity, community, grief, humor, survival—with tools and influences that didn’t exist twenty years ago.
If you want excitement, you have to seek it out. You have to court it. You have to risk boredom, risk disappointment, risk being wrong. That’s the deal. New music doesn’t owe you greatness on demand; it asks for your attention in exchange for the possibility of revelation.
So go out. Stand in the back or press up front. Clap awkwardly. Buy the record/CD/download/tape. Talk to the band. Argue with your friends about what you heard. This is how culture stays porous and human. This is how a town sounds like itself instead of a rerun.
The future of music isn’t missing—it’s tuning up, waiting for you to get off the couch and walk through the door.
Yesterday, I did this show with Tom Gilliam, and that’s the thing the algorithms will never understand. Two humans in a room, pulling songs out of the ether, reacting in real time, laughing when a track zigged where we expected a zag. Tom brought his usual mix of deep cuts and quiet conviction, the kind that says I trust this song to hold the room. No branding, no content strategy—just listening, choosing, and letting the music breathe for three hour when the season feels like it’s suffocating everything else.
Every December, the radio loses its damn mind.
The same songs come crawling out of the speakers like embalmed corpses in tinsel: glossy, overproduced, scrubbed of friction, scrubbed of history, scrubbed of anything resembling an actual human feeling. You could swap the station, the city, or the year and never know the difference. Time collapses. Experience flattens. You are trapped in a snow globe, and someone else is shaking it for profit.
And yet—somewhere beneath the jingle-industrial complex—people are still writing holiday songs that don’t sound like they were focus-grouped by a mall. Songs that admit the season is weird, heavy, funny, lonely, joyous, exhausting, and occasionally beautiful in spite of itself. Songs that don’t pretend everyone’s family gets along or that joy arrives on schedule.
That’s where the annual indie holiday show on Your Tuesday Afternoon Alternative comes in—not as seasonal programming, but as resistance.
Let’s get one thing straight: this isn’t about “saving Christmas.” Christmas doesn’t need saving. It’s doing just fine, selling sweaters and nostalgia to people who don’t necessarily like each other. This is about rescuing listening from the annual corporate hostage situation. It’s about carving out one afternoon where the holidays sound like actual life instead of a marketing campaign with sleigh bells.
Indie holiday music lives in the cracks. It’s written by people who don’t owe the season anything, which is precisely why it matters. These artists aren’t trying to out-Marathon Mariah or out-smile Bing Crosby. They’re asking different questions. What does winter feel like when you’re broke? What does joy sound like when it’s provisional? What happens when you miss someone who isn’t coming back, or never really came home in the first place?
That’s not anti-holiday. That’s honest.
An annual indie holiday show works because Your Tuesday Afternoon Alternative has never been about sonic wallpaper. The show treats music like it has consequences—like it comes from somewhere and goes somewhere else. Dropping an indie holiday show into that tradition doesn’t feel like a novelty episode; it feels like an extension of the show’s moral logic. If you care about music the rest of the year, why would you stop caring in December?
And let’s talk about ritual, because the mainstream gets that part wrong too. Ritual doesn’t mean repetition without thought. That’s just habit dressed up as tradition. Ritual means returning to something because it still tells the truth. An annual indie holiday show isn’t the same playlist every year—it’s the same intention. Same question, new answers. Same season, different weather.
Some years the songs lean hopeful, like they’re daring the future to be better. Other years they’re threadbare, muttering survival strategies over cheap keyboards and acoustic guitars. That fluctuation isn’t a bug—it’s the archive. You can trace cultural mood swings through these songs like tree rings. Pandemic years sound different. Post-pandemic years sound tired in new ways. Political chaos hums under the choruses whether the artists want it to or not.
Mainstream holiday radio pretends time stands still. Indie holiday music documents the fact that it doesn’t.
There’s also something quietly radical about giving these songs space. Holiday tracks by indie artists are usually treated like curios—one-off novelties, seasonal jokes, algorithmic dead ends. But when you put them together in a thoughtful broadcast, they stop being gimmicks and start sounding like what they are: people grappling with tradition in real time. Covers become reinterpretations. Originals become statements. Irony gives way to vulnerability.
And vulnerability, in December, is practically punk rock.
The indie holiday show also creates a temporary community—one that doesn’t require fake cheer or mandatory sentimentality. Listeners aren’t asked to feel a certain way; they’re invited to show up however they are. If you’re happy, great. If you’re barely holding it together, pull up a chair. There’s room for both. That’s a rare offer in a season obsessed with emotional conformity.
Over time, something else happens. Certain songs come back—not because they’re “classics,” but because they earned it. A track that once felt like a lifeline resurfaces years later as a memory. A song that sounded bleak one December suddenly feels tender in hindsight. The show accumulates history. It remembers for you.
That’s not nostalgia. That’s continuity.
There’s a curatorial responsibility here too. Indie holiday music exists in a thousand scattered corners—Bandcamp pages, limited vinyl runs, digital EPs dropped quietly into the void. An annual show gathers those fragments and says, “This matters. Someone heard this. You’re not alone.” That gesture means something in a culture where algorithms decide worth based on velocity instead of resonance.
And make no mistake: this is what independent radio is for. Not scale. Not domination. Presence. Choice. Taste with a point of view. At a time when “discovery” is mostly just machine-generated déjà vu, a human saying “listen to this—here’s why” is a small act of rebellion.
The indie holiday show also refuses the biggest lie of the season: that joy must be loud, uncomplicated, and universally accessible. Indie artists know better. They write about chosen families, fractured homes, grief that sharpens during celebrations, joy that arrives sideways and leaves early. These songs don’t cancel the holidays; they make them survivable.
Which brings us back to Your Tuesday Afternoon Alternative. Doing an annual indie holiday show isn’t branding. It’s ethos. It says the show doesn’t clock out when things get messy or sentimental. It says the holidays deserve the same critical attention, curiosity, and care as any other cultural moment.
And maybe that’s the real point. In a world hellbent on smoothing everything into sameness, this show insists on texture. On friction. On humanity. It trusts listeners to handle complexity—and that trust is rare.
So yes, do the indie holiday show. Do it every year. Let it change. Let it argue with itself. Let it contradict the season while still loving it. Let it be strange, sad, funny, and occasionally transcendent.
Because if the holidays are going to mean anything at all, they should at least sound like real people trying to make it through them together.
The Cords: how a band turns pop instincts into craft
If rock and roll really is dead, then The Cords clearly missed the memo, because their new self-titled record kicks the coffin lid open, steals the eulogy notes, and sets the funeral pyre dancing like it’s 1979 again and tomorrow doesn’t exist. This thing isn’t just a debut—it’s a declaration, a sugar-buzzed jolt of pop-bright indie rock that doesn’t pretend to be cool, doesn’t hide behind irony, and doesn’t give a damn about whatever trend some influencer is spoon-feeding their followers this week. It’s melody as oxygen, chorus as lifeline, guitars strummed like they’re trying to shake loose every last excuse you’ve ever had for not feeling something. And thank God for that—because in a year drowning in algorithmic uselessness, The Cord showed up with color, conviction, and the kind of hooks that tattoo themselves on your spine: refreshingly infectious, all-ages indie-pop and jangle pop collection with bright, melodic hooks and irresistible harmonies.
When a band chooses to release a self-titled record deep into a career or at a moment of reinvention, it’s rarely an accident. A self-title asks listeners to pay attention: this is who we are, for better or worse. On The Cords, that gesture reads less like self-importance and more like quiet confidence. The album crystallizes a group whose greatest gift is the paradox of seeming easy: songs that land as immediate, catchy pop but reveal, on repeat listens, careful craftsmanship — arrangements that balance lift and restraint, choruses that stick without shouting, and lyrics that prize specificity over cliché.
This review explores why The Cords has quickly emerged as one of 2025’s most beloved releases (or at least for us at Your Tuesday Afternoon Alternative), examining how the record was made, what each musician brings to its radiant clarity, and how the band’s sound fits squarely—and confidently—within contemporary indie-pop and power-pop currents. Reviewers have praised the album’s effervescent hooks, bright harmonies, and early-Beatles-meets-C86 charm, calling it a reminder that joy, immediacy, and craft can still feel revelatory. By looking closely at the songs and the meticulous yet exuberant musicianship behind them, this piece makes the case echoed by critics across the board: The Cords proves that in an era of over-processed noise, genuine craftsmanship not only still matters—it stands out.
Who are The Cords?
Asking “Who are The Cords?” is entirely reasonable, especially given how quickly the duo seemed to burst onto the 2025 music landscape with a fully formed sound and a debut record that feels more like the work of seasoned veterans than newcomers. Their name appeared almost overnight in reviews, playlists, and year-end lists, prompting curious listeners to wonder how a band this polished could arrive with so little advance fanfare. The question reflects both genuine intrigue and the natural impulse to understand the people behind a record that has connected so widely, so suddenly. Ok, ok… let’s answer the question directly: The Cords are a rising Scottish indie-pop sister duo, Eva (guitar, vocals) and Grace (drums and percussion) Tedeschi, known for their catchy, jangle-pop sound reminiscent of ’80s/90s C86 indie, featuring loud guitars, drums, and infectious melodies. They gained buzz in the UK indie scene, playing with major bands like Belle and Sebastian, and released their self-titled debut album this year, solidifying their place as exciting new musicians with a fresh take on classic indie pop.
So, sure, The Cords are a rising indie rock band whose self-titled debut has pushed them from regional curiosity to one of the year’s most talked-about new acts. That love comes honestly. It is built around a shared love of sharp pop melodies, jangling guitars, and choruses designed to ignite rooms both small and large. The band blends classic power-pop instincts with the earnest shimmer of modern indie. While each member brings a distinct musical background to the project—ranging from DIY home-recording scenes to more polished studio work—they come together with a unity of purpose: to make songs that feel immediate, heartfelt, and boldly melodic. Their chemistry is unmistakable, the kind of collaborative spark that makes a first record sound less like a beginning and more like a band arriving fully formed.
A band in the room, not a solo project on a laptop
One of the first things you notice about The Cords is its sense of feel. The record breathes the way a live band breathes: near-mic’d guitars trade phrases, the bass doesn’t merely hold down the root but sings counterlines, and the drums are both precise and human — they click when they should and push when the song needs momentum. That sonic chemistry suggests an actual group in a room rather than a single songwriter piling tracks onto a click-track.
On this record, the players are careful taste-makers: a lead vocalist who carries the melody with an effortless honesty; a guitar riff is economical but unforgettable; bass lines that anchor and color in equal measure; a drummer who doubles as a dynamic architect; and occasional keys and backing vocals that thicken textures without smothering them. The album’s production is shaped in large part by Jonny Scott and Simon Liddell, who not only handled the recording and overall sonic direction but also contributed additional bass and keyboard parts. Their involvement adds depth, texture, and subtle melodic detail, helping the songs land with a clarity and fullness that elevate the duo’s core ideas. That production leans toward warm melody rather than slick overprocessing — vocals swirl, the guitars ring, and harmonies bloom in native stereo. The effect is immediate and intimate, like a favorite radio station that somehow still surprises you with classic Scottish indie pop, bringing energy and authenticity to the genre.
Classic hooks, modern precision
Musically, The Cords live at the intersection of indie-pop and modern indie rock. If power-pop is the art of building irresistible choruses around smart songcraft, this record nods to that lineage while keeping its feet in the present. The guitars often prefer jangle and concise counter-motifs over endless studio tinkering with reverb; the drum sounds favor snap and presence within the mix; the bass is melodic. Production choices keep the songs forward and communicative.
What’s clever about the album is how it uses contrast. A sleek, hummable chorus might follow a verse that’s rhythmically skittish or harmonically unusual; a bright hook will sit atop an unexpectedly rueful lyric. That push-and-pull keeps songs from flattening into mere earworms. The band knows how to write a chorus that hooks on first listen, but they’re more interested in building shoulders for those hooks to stand on so the singer can mean what she has to say within the sway of the song.
Ordinary detail, emotional honesty
Lyric writing on The Cords resists broad platitudes. Instead of grand pronouncements, these songs live in particulars: a lit street outside an apartment window, the wrong song playing on a cheap jukebox, saying goodbye, not knowing what to say. Those details anchor the songs emotionally; they make choruses feel earned rather than handed to the listener.
Themes recur — the ache of imperfect relationships, the friction between wanting to leave and wanting to belong, the peculiar loneliness of modern urban life — but the band treats these themes as lived experience, not albums’ worth of slogans. There’s tenderness here, an ability to hold both humor and regret in the same line. When the chorus opens up into sing-along clarity, the words are often small but direct, the kind that a listener can latch onto and repeat in daily life.
Rather than a list of titles, the album’s architecture is worth noting: it opens with a confident, urgent cut, “Fabulist” that announces the band’s melodic ambitions; it centers itself with a pair of mid-album songs that reveal its lyrical depth while stilling rocking (“You” and “I’m Not Sad”); and it closes with a return to the jangle with a reflective piece that leaves more questions than answers, “When You Said Goodbye” — a satisfying structure that mirrors human experience rather than manufactured catharsis.
The opener works as a thesis statement: brisk tempo, jangly guitars, a pre-chorus that sets up the payoff, and a chorus that lands like a bright bruise — it’s immediate and impossible to ignore. The arrangement focuses on guitar and drums, yet leaves space for letting the lyric breathe before swelling into a harmony-rich chorus. That dynamic — economy vs. abundance — is where the record’s emotional intelligence shows. The listener feels tugged along rather than pushed.
Musicianship: pop instincts, instrumental care
One of the pleasures of The Cords is hearing instrumentalists who understand restraint within the landscape of Scottish indie pop. The lead guitar rarely indulges in long solos; instead, short melodic figures become hooks in themselves. The bass often carries melodic interest in places a secondary vocal might have; the drums use space and silence as effectively as fills and cymbal swells. These are not instrumental showpieces; they are choices made to serve the song.
Backing vocals are used sparingly but to great effect: stacked parts in choruses heighten the sense of communal voice, whereas single harmony lines in bridges add emotional nuance. Keys and synths make tasteful cameos — a pad here, a tuned key there — supporting rather than competing. The overall musicianship communicates a band comfortable with pop’s mechanics yet allergic to disposable glitz.
Production plays a crucial role in a record like this. The engineers and producers behind The Cords opt for a live-room warmth; you can hear the string of the guitar and the breath before the vocal. The mix privileges midrange clarity so the melodies cut through without overwhelming the low end. Transients on percussion are preserved to give the drums snap, and the stereo image is used to place instruments in space rather than to dazzle with effects. That sonic philosophy — preserve the room, let the song guide the mix — keeps the album feeling human. It’s pop music with a pulse rather than sterilized pop.
For whom this record is made
The Cords will appeal to listeners who prize tunes that reward attention. Fans of classic power-pop and jangly indie rock will find the hooks irresistible, but casual listeners will also appreciate the plainspoken choruses and immediate melodies. The record sits comfortably between the worlds of radio friendliness and indie credibility: radio programmers get singable choruses; critics get craft and nuance.
Younger listeners who grew up with playlist culture may be surprised by how an album built around consistent melodic logic can still create small shocks of recognition — the kind of “I know this” feeling that a succinct chorus can produce. Older listeners will appreciate the band’s affinity for tradition without nostalgia.
This record matters
In a popular music moment dominated by hyper-production, viral singles, and an ever-shortening attention span, a record like The Cords is quietly radical. It insists on songcraft: beginning, middle, and end; it assumes the listener will return; it foregrounds human voices and real instruments. The album’s lack of pretense is, paradoxically, its statement. It shows how pop can be both pleasurable and thoughtful, how choruses can be cathartic without being manipulative.
For a listener who wants immediacy without cheapness — a hook that doesn’t insult intelligence — The Cords offers reassurance: good songs still matter, and a band playing together still sounds like something worth cherishing.
A self-titled album is a claim. The Cords lay claim to that title gently but firmly: here is a band confident in its pop instincts and literate in its emotional choices. The record’s charm rests on the marriage of classic pop construction with modern precision, the musicians’ disciplined instincts, and songwriting that values detail over slogan. It isn’t a manifesto; it’s a practice. And in an era of flash, there’s a particular pleasure in watching a band quietly do the work of making songs that last.
Look, Nebraska was already perfect in that cold-coffee, blackout-3-a.m. way that records sometimes accidentally are—Springsteen mumbling ghosts into a four-track like he’s afraid the neighbors might hear him unraveling. You don’t “improve” a hallucination. But here comes Nebraska ’82 with its alternate visions, its rust-belt apparitions, and suddenly you realize perfection isn’t the point anyway. What we’re getting now is the messy archaeology of a masterpiece—the dirt under its fingernails, the tape hiss, the roads not taken. It doesn’t dethrone the original bedroom-confessional monolith; it stands off to the side like a cracked mirror held up to the same bleak American sky. And damn if that mirror doesn’t show something worth staring into all over again.
Nebraska ’82: Expanded Edition arrives at the right time
With the 2025 release of Nebraska ’82: Expanded Edition, Springsteen and his team have delivered the most comprehensive, honest, and vivid portrait of one of the most haunted, intimate, and influential albums in rock history. The box set includes a newly remastered version of Nebraska as originally released, previously unheard demo outtakes, the long-rumored “Electric Nebraska” sessions with the full band, and a newly recorded live performance filmed in 2025.
For newcomers and longtime fans alike, this release offers both context and extension: context for how Nebraska came to be — from home demos on a TASCAM to a full LP — and extension in the form of alternate takes, jukebox-ready electric arrangements, and reflections of the songs through decades of memory.
It’s not just nostalgia or archival shelf-cleaning. What emerges is an album whose darkness, subtlety, and emotional power remain urgent. Nebraska ’82 still speaks — perhaps even more clearly now — to lives marked by uncertainty, longing, and resilience.
The original Nebraska — stark, personal, unforgettable
When Springsteen recorded Nebraska in late 1981 and early 1982, he did so not with a studio full of musicians but with a four-track recorder in his bedroom, an acoustic guitar, and a stark vision. The result was an album unlike anything else in his catalogue: bleak, intimate, confessional, but not confessional in a self-pitying sense. These were songs born from solitude, from the rawness of fear, regret, despair — made real by economy of arrangement.
Tracks like “Atlantic City,” “Johnny 99,” “State Trooper,” and “My Father’s House” traversed the margins of the American dream: economic hardship, moral desperation, violence, yearning for redemption. The spare instrumentation — sometimes only a guitar and a voice — made every lyric, every tremor of the vocal, every pause between notes count. The result is widely considered one of the great solo records in rock.
Decades later, Nebraska remains the gold standard for how quiet, low-fi recordings can deliver emotional immediacy. For many, it’s not just an album — it’s a private confessional, seen through the lens of loneliness and lost dreams.
What the Expanded Edition adds — and why it matters
Remastering with care
First, the 2025 remaster brings Nebraska into sharper focus without erasing its haunted intimacy. In a landscape where remasters often polish away character, this one preserves the album’s texture — the creaks, the echoes, the warmth of an acoustic guitar reverberating in a home studio — while improving clarity and depth. Critics who’ve heard the new edition note that the remastering reveals subtle layers previously buried: the quiet background of a mandolin here, the soft echo in the final chords there, the breath before a harsh lyric.
In short: the remastered Nebraska doesn’t feel like a revived relic — it feels alive again.
Solo outtakes and previously unreleased songs
The set’s first discs unearth acoustic outtakes and songs from the original 1982 sessions that didn’t make the album: Child Bride, The Losin’ Kind, Gun in Every Home, and On the Prowl — material fans have traded as bootlegs for decades or assumed lost forever.
Hearing them in official, high-quality form is revelatory. Tracks like “Gun in Every Home” offer a nightmarish portrait of domestic collapse and despair; “On the Prowl” pulses with a restless, searching energy that resonates with the rest of the album’s themes. Even though these songs were originally omitted, they expand the emotional terrain of Nebraska — reminding listeners that the darkness had multiple facets and that the record’s focus was always selective, not total.
Electric Nebraska — the “what might have been”
Perhaps the most dramatic and controversial addition is the long-rumored “Electric Nebraska” sessions. In April 1982, shortly after finishing the solo demos, Springsteen brought several members of the E Street Band into the studio (including Max Weinberg and Garry Tallent) and attempted full-band recordings of several Nebraska songs. In 2025, those sessions have finally emerged publicly — the first time many had heard them.
The results provoke awe — and ambivalence. On one hand, songs like electric versions of Atlantic City or Johnny 99 have a muscular, rock-ready energy. A demo of Born in the U.S.A. — originally written in the same era — appears in trio form (Springsteen, Weinberg, Tallent), described as “punk rockabilly.” It is electrifying, raw, and historically fascinating.
On the other hand — and critics largely agree — turning Nebraska into a full-band rock record would have gutted much of its power. The original’s bleak intimacy, its ghost-town loneliness, its moral urgency — all flowed from isolation and austerity. As Uncut’s review put it: “Electric Nebraska might have produced a competent rock album, but it wouldn’t have been Nebraska.”
The electric versions often feel like exercises — intriguing, occasionally thrilling, but never quite as honest. The contrast only strengthens the myth of the original: a man alone with a guitar, bearing witness to the American underbelly.
A 2025 live performance: memory as lens
Rounding out the set is a newly filmed live performance — Springsteen playing the full Nebraska album in order, at the Count Basie Theatre, Red Bank, New Jersey. Accompanied subtly by veteran musicians such as Larry Campbell and Charlie Giordano, the performance is respectful rather than grandiose, earnest rather than nostalgic. In a press statement, Springsteen remarked on the experience: hearing the songs again, he was struck by their “weight” — their capacity to move, even after decades.
The filmed concert is not a re-creation but a meditation. Compared with the original 1982 recordings, the live versions reflect the distance of time — a deeper voice, more lived-in phrasing — but they carry the songs’ sorrow, hope, and grit into a present that, for many listeners, remains uncertain.
What Nebraska ’82: Expanded Edition reveals about Nebraska’s enduring power
Listening to the full box set is, in a way, a masterclass in artistic decision — what to keep, what to discard, what to preserve, what to experiment with.
The original Nebraska stands undiminished. If anything, the contrast with the electric takes and outtakes sharpens what made it special. The sparseness, the solitude, the haunted tonal space — all reveal that Springsteen’s choice to release demos instead of studio recordings was not a compromise but a commitment to emotional truth. As one critic writes, the set underscores that “even when testing out the material with his most intuitive collaborators … the definitive version of Nebraska remains the one he captured on tape… tracking solo demos.”
Yet the collection is not purely about preservation — it expands the artist’s vision. The outtakes and electric versions show songs as living things: malleable, re-interpretive, incomplete. They reflect a period of creative restlessness, of questioning whether Americana songs needed to be acoustic, dark, personal, or if they could rock, rage, and roar.
For fans and historians, Nebraska ’82 offers context. For new listeners, it might serve as the entry point. For all, it’s a reminder that rock — stripped-down or electric — can still carry the weight of real human stories.
A few tensions and enduring questions
The Expanded Edition is not without controversy. Some reviewers warn against over-romanticizing the demos and dismissing the electric takes outright. As one Guardian column argues, if listeners imagine full-scale E Street–style treatments, they’ll likely be disappointed: the electric tracks “take the edge off, neutralising their impact.”
Others worry that the outtakes and alternate versions — while fascinating — might dilute the mythic purity of Nebraska. After all, part of the record’s power lies in its restraint. The expanded set invites comparisons, second-guessing, and reconsideration that can feel like peeling away a protective layer.
But perhaps that is precisely the point: art is not a mausoleum. Revisiting is not desecration — it is re-examination. And Nebraska ’82 gives listeners the tools to understand not just what the album was, but what it might have been, and what it still can be.
Why this edition matters — now so many years later
2025 is not 1982. The world Springsteen sang about — poverty, despair, moral compromise, broken dreams — has changed in many ways, yet in others remains startlingly similar. Economic instability, social dislocation, disillusionment with institutions — many of the conditions that haunted Nebraska then still haunt us now.
In that sense, Nebraska ’82: Expanded Edition arrives not as nostalgia, but as relevance. The spare melodies, the tales of desperation and longing, the fractures in the American dream — they resonate with renewed urgency. And by revisiting them alongside alternate takes and newer interpretations, listeners are invited to reflect not just on the past, but on how songs age, shift, and heal.
For younger listeners who might only know Springsteen from his arena-rock anthems or later work, this box set offers a different face of “the Boss” — quieter, darker, more human.
For longtime fans, it’s a gift: a chance to listen again, to compare, to reconsider.
A masterpiece re-examined — and still alive
Nebraska ’82: Expanded Edition does more than archive a landmark record. It reopens its doors, pulls back the curtain, and lets us hear not just the final songs, but the echoes, the experiments, the what-ifs, and the near-misses.
In doing so, it reaffirms what made Nebraska a classic: the courage to strip away everything but voice and guitar, to trust silence, to speak plainly about fear, regret, and survival. But it also acknowledges that songs are not static. They breathe, shift, and can be reborn.
Whether you come for the electric sessions, the unheard demos, the 2025 live film — or simply to hear Nebraska again — the result is the same: you feel the weight of its stories, the depth of its sorrow, the faint but persistent light of hope.
Forty-three years after it was first recorded in a bedroom in Colts Neck, Nebraska still matters. Nebraska ’82: Expanded Edition proves that not just as history, but as living, breathing music.
You know what? Saying rock and roll really began with Rubber Soul isn’t some heretical bolt from the blue; it’s the kind of wild-eyed truth you only admit after years of peeling back the layers of myth and noise. Because that record wasn’t just an album; it was the moment the Beatles stopped being mop-topped charm merchants and turned into full-blown sonic arsonists.
Rubber Soul is where the walls blew open — where pop hooks sprouted strange new limbs, where folk met psychedelia in a dark alley and decided to run away together, where music discovered it didn’t have to smile to be loved.
You can feel the whole future of rock wriggling under the skin of those tracks. It was the Big Bang disguised as a studio experiment, the blueprint for everyone who ever wanted their guitar to be both a confession and a weapon. So yeah — call it the beginning. Plenty of albums came before, but Rubber Soul is where rock stopped crawling and started walking into the fire.
“Rock and roll as we know it began with Rubber Soul” isn’t just a clever line—it’s the truth Paste is tapping into.Released on December 3rd in 1965, the album marks the moment the Beatles stepped out of the frenzy of Beatlemania and into a more mature, deeply intentional era of songwriting. Rubber Soul didn’t just elevate their own sound; it challenged everyone around them—most famously pushing the Beach Boys to rethink their sun-soaked formulas and ultimately inspiring Pet Sounds.
What makes Rubber Soul so enduring is how confidently it bridges pop accessibility with artistic experimentation. The band broadened the emotional and musical palette of rock, weaving in introspection, sharper storytelling, and new textures that hinted at the psychedelic shift to come. It’s the point where John, Paul, George, and Ringo became not just stars, but innovators—artists who were actively reshaping the possibilities of popular music.
Paste is right to celebrate it: Rubber Soul wasn’t just another release—it was the hinge on which the Beatles’ legacy, and arguably modern rock itself, turned.
December ’65 the Beatles were supposed to be polished mascots of Beatlemania, grinning through another round of yeah-yeah-yeahs. Instead they walked into the studio, slammed the door behind them, and came out holding a whole new universe in their hands.
Rubber Soul is the moment they stopped playing the pop-star game and started playing God with melody and mood. Suddenly the harmonies got darker, the jokes got stranger, and the whole band sounded like they’d actually been listening—to Dylan, to each other, to the static in their own heads. And the Beach Boys? Forget surfboards; this album practically shoved Brian Wilson into a sensory deprivation tank and dared him to come back with something better.
What Paste gets right is that Rubber Soul isn’t just a “mature” Beatles record—it’s the pivot where the mop-tops mutated into the mad scientists we mythologize. A band shedding its skin in real time. A warning shot to everyone else who thought they were making serious music.
If rock and roll has a Year Zero, this album is one of the few places you can actually hear the fuse catching.
Indie rock has always thrived on the fringes: small venues, tiny labels, and the slow-building careers that reward patience more than hype. Few contemporary bands embody this spirit better than Elephants and Stars, the Canadian band whose latest album, Under the Earth and Above Heaven, feels like the result of years dedicated to refining melody, guitar as truth, rock and roll meaning, and a hard-won optimism tempered with a slight sarcasm that comes from not taking oneself too seriously. A real understanding that life has ups and downs.
The album’s title suggests a band thinking about place, about being suspended between hardship and hope, about grounding themselves even as they reach. And in many ways, this duality captures the spirit of Elephants and Stars themselves: musicians who write like they’ve lived a little, but still believe that a good chorus can solve something in the soul. A great song can change the world.
Under the Earth and Above Heaven is, simply put, their most confident and emotionally resonant work to date. But the record is also a reminder of why rock, guitars, harmonies, and honest storytelling still matter.
The band behind the sound To understand the record, it helps to understand the people who made it. Elephants and Stars operate in a tradition familiar to fans of early 2000s alternative rock: tight rhythm sections, guitars that shimmer and crunch, and lyrics that manage sincerity without slipping into sentimentality.
The lineup, anchored by frontman Manfred Sittmann, whose signature vocals blend warmth with a slight rasp, has solidified into a group whose interplay feels lived-in. Sittmann writes and sings with the clarity of someone who knows the exact weight of each line, but the band behind him keeps things agile rather than precious. Sittmann’s melodic instincts shape much of the band’s identity. He’s joined by Adam Seed, whose lead guitar work brings a sharp, expressive edge to their sound, and longtime collaborator Michael MacMillan, whose bass lines provide both structure, rhythm, and warmth. The rhythm section finds its heartbeat in drummer Stewart McKinney, while Simon Head expands the band’s sonic palette with textured, atmospheric keyboard layers. Together, they create a modern rock sound grounded in pop-punk roots. Music that’s unmistakably hook-driven yet designed with a clear mission: to help bring rock back to the forefront.
The band’s story stretches back years, especially for Sittmann and MacMillan, who previously played together in the excellent group Soap Opera. Their long creative history gives the songs on their latest release a natural chemistry and ease, the feeling of musicians who know exactly how to respond to one another. That chemistry reaches a new peak on Under the Earth and Above Heaven, released in February of this year and produced by Ian Blurton, a collaboration that sharpens their sound while preserving the emotional immediacy that defines their work.
The guitars, often handled in layered pairs, move between bright open-chord passages and more aggressive leads. The bass lines are melodic without overpowering the mix, and the drumming is purposeful and punchy where it should be, restrained where the lyrics need breathing room. The result is a sound built on chemistry rather than simply studio polish.
The band feels like a cohort of people who know how to play to each other’s strengths. This matters because Under the Earth and Above Heaven is an album that depends on emotional pacing: crescendos that feel earned, shifts in tone that feel organic, and choruses that arrive with the momentum of a live show.
A sound defined by uplift without naïveté From the opening track, Elephants and Stars make it clear that they are uninterested in the cynicism that often dominates modern rock. Their guitars ring with a kind of unguarded cascade of sonic joy, even when the lyrics are wrestling with frustration or loss. One of the most striking qualities of this album is how hope and melancholy coexist—not in competition, but in conversation.
The production leans into this duality. Vocals sit slightly forward in the mix, giving Sittmann’s storytelling a sense of directness and intimacy. The guitars, meanwhile, expand outward: wide, textured, layered. It’s the kind of sound associated with late-afternoon festival sets—sunlight still visible, the air cooling, the crowd settling into a collective feeling. And the sound? Loud, propulsive, aggressive, like a sonic caress.
What keeps the record from drifting into nostalgia is the band’s sense of precision. Each song feels built, not merely written. The hooks land with purpose. The bridges feel like necessary expansions, not detours. And the choruses—Elephants and Stars’ greatest strength—arrive like emotional confirmations. This is a band that believes in melody the way some bands believe in distortion pedals: as the emotional engine of the music.
The lyrical world of the album If the sound carries the emotional lift, the lyrics provide the grounding. Under the Earth and Above Heaven reads like a record about transition—moving from one stage of life to another, reconciling who you were with who you’re trying to become. The “earth” and “heaven” of the title function less as metaphysical spaces and more as metaphors for the pressures we carry and the aspirations we hold. Across the record, recurring themes emerge.
Across Under the Earth and Above Heaven, Elephants and Stars weave a thematic through-line that feels both deeply personal and universally readable. The record begins by making peace with the past, returning again and again to the bittersweet truth that old mistakes never quite vanish. Yet the band refuses to sink into regret. Instead, they treat memory like an old photograph—something to regard with a mix of tenderness and hard-earned gratitude for having made it through. That reflective stance sets the stage for one of the album’s central concerns: the search for steadiness in a world that rarely offers it. Life, as their lyrics suggest, often feels precarious, a suspended moment in which you’re “almost there” but never fully settled. But rather than express anxiety, the band leans toward determination, riding out the instability with resolve.
That determination is buoyed by another recurring insight: the importance of connection. Throughout the album, relationships of all kinds—romantic partners, close friends, the communities we build around ourselves—appear as the forces that keep us grounded. These songs push against the temptation to withdraw, insisting instead that meaning comes from being in the world with others. And within that engagement, the band finds flashes of transcendence in the most ordinary places: singing in the car, watching the sunrise after a sleepless night, catching the sound of someone’s laughter at just the right moment. These quiet, luminous details echo the “above heaven” imagery of the album’s title, suggesting that the extraordinary often reveals itself in the spaces where we least expect it.
The record carries an autobiographical weight without tipping into confession. Rather than offering a straightforward personal narrative, it gestures toward shared emotional terrain—less “here is my story” and more “here is a feeling you have probably known.” And while a full song-by-song analysis would exceed the scope of this discussion, several tracks stand out for the way they shape the album’s emotional arc, guiding listeners through reflection, uncertainty, connection, and ultimately the little but meaningful possibilities of joy.
The opener: urgency with clarity The opening track, The Ceiling, wastes no time establishing the album’s stakes. A driving beat, guitars that arrive fully formed, and lyrics that describe the moment when indecision becomes action. It feels like a thesis statement: the band is not here to wallow; they are here to move. A bit more than midway through the record comes a standout track that shifts the tempo and deepens the tone, ‘Unlucky.’ This is where the band’s lyrical strengths shine: reflections on resilience, the cost of growth, and the quiet strength found in simply continuing. The arrangement builds around a groove—guitar, sway in the keyboards, more subtle percussion, then a full electric swell—mirroring the emotional climb.
The late-album surge: an anthem of uplift As the album nears its conclusion, the band leans into one of their most triumphant choruses to date on ‘Paint Me Alive’. It’s the kind of moment designed to be shouted back at the stage, hands in the air, the kind of collective catharsis that only rock music can produce. The lyrics, which center on choosing light even when darkness is familiar, feel earned precisely because the album has carried listeners through doubt and tension.
The final track, The Ghosts, does something rare: it provides closure without collapsing into tidy resolution. It acknowledges the uncertainties that remain but offers a melodic reassurance that moving forward—however imperfectly—is worth celebrating.
Three elements make Under the Earth and Above Heaven one of Elephants and Stars’ most compelling releases: 1) Musical consistency without monotony. 2) The band has refined their sound without becoming predictable. And 3) Each song feels connected to the whole, but no two entries collapse into each other.
Emotional honesty that creates community In an era where irony often dominates indie music discourse, Elephants and Stars commit wholeheartedly to sincerity. Their stories are earnest but never naive. The band creates A sense of community embedded in the music. Listening to the album feels like being welcomed into a shared emotional space. It’s personal, but it’s not private.
Elephants and Stars occupy an interesting place in today’s musical world. They are neither trend-chasers nor purists. Instead, they carry forward the tradition of emotionally articulate guitar rock: bands like The Weakerthans, early Jimmy Eat World, or mid-period The Hold Steady—artists who treat songwriting as craft rather than marketing. Their music reminds listeners that rock still has a role to play in articulating everyday emotional life. Not the grand dramas, but the subtle struggles: trying to be better, trying to stay hopeful, trying to find footing. In a digital era marked by fragmentation and fatigue, Under the Earth and Above Heaven feels refreshingly grounded.
Perhaps the greatest achievement of the album is its replayability. The first listen offers immediacy—hooks that land, choruses that stick. But subsequent listens reveal the details: the way a harmony hangs in the background, the way a guitar line subtly echoes a lyrical theme, the way the rhythm section builds tension without overstating it. This is music built not just to impress, but to accompany. It is the kind of record listeners grow with and discover far more over repeated listens.
An album for the moment we’re in Under the Earth and Above Heavensucceeds because it feels like an album made by people committed to the power of song—not spectacle, not persona, but the craft of building moments of connection. In a fractured cultural moment, that feels almost radical.
Elephants and Stars may never be the kind of band that dominates streaming algorithms or headlines massive festivals. But this record demonstrates why they matter: they make music that sees listeners clearly. They make music that names the feelings many of us carry. They make music that reaches upward, outward, toward one another.
And sometimes, that’s exactly what good rock music is supposed to do.
We could have easily titled this column ‘Making Sense of It All: The Kyle Sowashes and the Enduring Power of Indie Rock Honesty,’ because the band’s new record not only showcases their musical growth but also highlights how their plainspoken sincerity continues to resonate in a genre often crowded with irony and affectation.
Independent rock has long thrived on the margins—small rooms, frayed gear, and bands that carve out meaning from the ordinary. Few groups embody this spirit as honestly and as energetically as The Kyle Sowashes, the long-running Columbus, Ohio outfit centered around singer, guitarist, and songwriter Kyle Sowash. Their terrific new record, Start Making Sense, feels both like a culmination of years of steady work and a refreshed sense of purpose. It is an album that sounds lived-in yet ambitious, familiar yet surprisingly expansive.
Like so many of their releases, it is driven by a collaborative band spirit, anchored by Sowash’s unmistakable songwriting voice. But on Start Making Sense, the musicians around him play an especially notable role. This is not merely a collection of songs written by a single songwriter—it is a group effort in the best sense, marked by thoughtful arrangements, spirited performances, and a chemistry that can only develop after years of making music together. The result is a record that feels warm, wry, cathartic, and deeply human.
A Band Made of People, Not Parts
The Kyle Sowashes have always been a band that foregrounds musicianship over mythology. No one is placed on a pedestal; every member shapes the sound. On Start Making Sense, the interplay among the musicians is central to what makes the record feel so alive.
At the center, of course, is Kyle Sowash, the principal songwriter, guitarist, and narrator of the band’s emotional landscape. His style has always blended self-deprecation with sincerity, humor with frustration, resignation with hope. He writes songs the way people talk when they’ve stopped trying to impress anyone. That honesty, paired with a gift for sticky melodies and driving chord progressions, continues to anchor the band.
But the supporting cast expands and elevates the material. The rhythm section, always a strength for the group, is especially tight on this release. The basslines give songs bounce and propulsion, while the drumming adds both momentum and nuance—capable of big-room punch but also subtle shifts in tone that mirror Sowash’s lyrical turns. Together they give the album its shape: urgent when needed, contemplative when the songs pull inward.
The guitar arrangements, too, show a band deeply comfortable playing with space. There are moments of noisy celebration, fuzzed-out riffs, and guitar lines that nod to 90s indie rock and power pop without ever feeling derivative. But there is also restraint when the songs call for it—arpeggiated lines, single-note phrases, and open-chord patterns that accent Sowash’s vocal pacing. The band understands when to push and when to stay out of the way, and that mutual sensitivity is one of the record’s quiet triumphs.
All of this makes Start Making Sense feel less like a front-person project and more like a snapshot of a genuine musical community. The band members are collaborators—not session players—and the record reflects that shared vision.
Sound: An Indie Rock Dial Tuned Just Right
The defining pleasure of listening to The Kyle Sowashes is the feeling that the band knows exactly who they are and that they approach their sound not as a limitation but as an expressive engine. Start Making Sense follows this tradition, delivering songs that are rooted in classic indie rock but refreshed through craft, energy, and emotional clarity.
The album’s guitar-forward sound recalls the big-hearted crunch of bands like Superchunk, The Weakerthans, early Guided by Voices, and 90s midwestern basement rock. But The Kyle Sowashes are not imitators. Their tone is warmer, their pacing more deliberate, their hooks more conversational. They capture what it feels like to be a functional adult who still carries adolescent anxieties; what it feels like to want to grow but not always know how.
The production strikes a careful balance. It is clean enough to reveal the band’s tight musicianship but raw enough to preserve the lived-in charm that defines their identity. The vocals are present but never over-polished; the guitars are textured but not overly layered; the drums have a live-room feel that makes even the more introspective songs sound communal.
This approach is particularly effective because Sowash’s songwriting thrives on immediacy. These songs feel like they were meant to be played in small rooms full of people who understand what it’s like to try, fail, and try again. The sonic palette—guitars that jangle and buzz, drums that sprint and shuffle, bass that grounds and guides—mirrors the emotional palette of the songs themselves.
What the Lyrics Reveal: Vulnerability Without Pretension
What has always separated Kyle Sowash from many of his indie rock peers is his ability to write lyrics that feel like real conversations. He avoids metaphors that spin out into abstraction and instead leans on the everyday: the tension between optimism and exhaustion, the mundane rhythms of adulthood, the stubborn persistence of doubt.
On Start Making Sense, the lyrics feel particularly pointed. There is a thematic thread running through the record about wanting to take stock of one’s life, wanting to be better (or at least different), but also feeling the tug of old habits or long-held insecurities. This tension animates the album emotionally.
Sowash wrestles with questions familiar to anyone who has lived long enough to feel the weight of their own decisions:
Am I becoming the person I hoped to be?
Am I letting people down without realizing it?
Is it too late to make meaningful changes?
Why does clarity arrive when I am least prepared for it?
And yet, the writing never lapses into self-pity. Sowash has a rare talent for pairing difficult emotions with flashes of humor or casual understatement. His delivery—half earnest, half exasperated—adds to this effect. Even in the most introspective moments, he trusts his audience. He doesn’t sermonize or hide behind dense metaphor. He simply tells the truth as he sees it.
The Album as a Whole: Why Start Making Sense Works
The strength of the record lies not just in its individual songs but in its overall narrative arc. Start Making Sense feels like a journey, not in a conceptual or theatrical sense, but in the emotional progression from beginning to end.
The early tracks tend to have a forward-thrusting, energetic urgency—songs filled with questions, doubts, and attempts to find clarity. As the album unfolds, the pacing shifts: there are moments of introspection, acceptance, humor, resignation, and renewed commitment.
By the final songs, the album arrives somewhere quieter and more grounded. The narrator has not solved everything—far from it—but there is a sense of movement, of incremental progress. And that sense is arguably more meaningful than any dramatic revelation would be.
This emotional pacing mirrors the band’s musical pacing. The guitars pull back when the lyrics sink deeper; the rhythm section tightens when the narrator feels unsettled; the arrangements widen when Sowash leans into hopeful refrains. The band listens to the songs, and the songs reward that attention.
Why They Matter Now
There is something profoundly refreshing about hearing a band like The Kyle Sowashes release a record like Start Making Sense in 2025. In a music culture where so many albums are shaped by algorithms, trends, or online personas, this record feels defiantly human. It is made by musicians who value craft, community, and honesty over spectacle.
Moreover, the themes of Start Making Sense—struggle, ambivalence, small victories, persistent hope—resonate in a cultural moment marked by fatigue and uncertainty. Many listeners will hear echoes of their own lives in the record: the feeling of trying to recalibrate when everything seems slightly off; the desire to “start making sense” of things that once felt straightforward.
The album does not promise transformation or transcendence. Instead, it offers companionship—a reminder that confusion and self-questioning are universal, and that music can help make sense of things even when life does not.
A Career Highlight and a Quiet Triumph
Start Making Sense stands as one of The Kyle Sowashes’ most affecting and best-crafted albums. It blends the energy of earlier records with a deeper emotional palette; it shows a band confident in its identity yet open to growth. The musicianship is sharp, the lyrics are resonant, and the sound manages to be both comfortingly familiar and subtly evolved.
It is not merely a strong indie rock record—it is a document of adulthood, of persistence, of reassessment, of trying again. In its modesty, it finds profundity; in its humor, it finds catharsis; in its unvarnished honesty, it finds connection. For longtime fans, Start Making Sense will feel like a natural and satisfying next chapter. For new listeners, it offers a compelling introduction to a band that has quietly built one of the most sincere bodies of work in Midwestern indie rock. And for everyone, it offers something increasingly rare: a rock album that makes you feel less alone.
Streaming Forward, Powered By The Past - if you love the 80s music, new music, Eurovision, cheesy pop and awesome playlists then let's get this pop party started!
your tuesday afternoon alternative 