Please, Please, Please Let Me See the Show (This Time)

Morrissey has always been a weather system, not a touring artist. You don’t buy a ticket to see him so much as you gamble—you place a small, hopeful wager against history, logistics, exhaustion, grievance, the universe, and Morrissey himself. And in the last several years, the house has been winning.

Let’s talk numbers, because numbers have a way of cutting through myth. Since roughly 2019, Morrissey has canceled a staggering share of his scheduled concerts. Tracking sites that obsess over these things, think of them as the baseball-card collectors of broken promises, suggest that in the most recent stretch alone, he’s canceled nearly half of what he’s booked. In 2024, nine out of twenty-three shows vanished. In 2025, thirty-two out of sixty-three evaporated. Early 2026? Two more were gone before the coffee finished brewing on the new year. Forty-three cancellations in about two years. Forty-nine of his last hundred shows, period. Flip a coin. Heads, you get “There Is a Light That Never Goes Out.” Tails, you get an apologetic Instagram post.

Last Night I Dreamt That Somebody Played the Show

Now, before the comment section of this blog lights up like a bonfire of sanctimony, let’s be clear: this isn’t a hit job. Morrissey doesn’t need one. He’s been doing his own PR demolition derby for decades. This is about what it means when an artist who once articulated romantic alienation for an entire generation now can’t reliably show up in the flesh to sing about it.

Because live music, real, sweaty, inconvenient, human live music, is a contract. It’s not just a transaction, not a barcode scan, and a T-shirt upsell. It’s a promise: I will be there if you are. And when that promise breaks often enough, it stops feeling tragic and starts feeling structural.

Here’s where we can kick open the door and start yelling: rock and roll is not supposed to be a reliable thing, but it is supposed to be an act of presence. You can be sloppy, you can be late, you can be drunk, you can be transcendent or terrible, but you have to exist on the stage. Cancellation is the anti-performance. It’s a ghost story told by a promoter.

This Charming Man Will Not Appear Tonight

Morrissey’s defenders will point to his health, exhaustion, the cruelty of touring in one’s sixties, and the meatless catering demands of a man who has turned vegetarianism into performance art. All fair points! Touring is brutal. Capitalism eats its elders. The road is a grinder, but it has better lighting. But here’s the problem: Morrissey’s cancellation habit isn’t a sudden decline—it’s a pattern. A long, well-documented, almost conceptual-art-level commitment to not showing up.

And patterns change how we listen.

Once upon a time, Morrissey’s flakiness felt romantic. The same way The Smiths felt impossibly fragile, like they might dissolve if you looked at them too hard. You forgave the missed shows because the songs felt like secrets whispered directly into your ear. You forgave him because you believed—wrongly, beautifully—that sensitivity was incompatible with reliability.

But fast-forward to now, where entire tour legs disappear like a Vegas magician’s assistant, and the romance curdles into consumer fatigue. Fans book flights. Fans take time off work. Fans arrange childcare. Fans in Latin America, Europe, the Midwest—people for whom a Morrissey show is not a casual Tuesday night but a once-in-a-decade pilgrimage—get left holding the emotional bag.

Schrödinger’s Morrissey: The Show Both Exists and Doesn’t

At some point, the question stops being “Why does Morrissey cancel?” and becomes “Why do we keep pretending this is surprising?”

This is where Morrissey becomes less a singer and more a metaphor for late-stage rock stardom. He is the walking embodiment of the contradiction: an artist whose work once validated vulnerability now presiding over a system that treats audience trust as optional. He’s not alone in this, but he’s the most extreme case study because his cancellation rate is so high it borders on performance itself. It’s almost as if the absence is the point.

And maybe that’s the cruel irony. Morrissey, the great bard of loneliness, has perfected a way to make tens of thousands of people feel collectively stood up.

The tragedy isn’t that he cancels. The tragedy is that the cancellations have become part of the brand. They are baked into the expectation. “Did the show happen?” becomes the first question, not “Was it good?” That’s a catastrophic downgrade in cultural terms. Rock and roll isn’t supposed to be a Schrödinger’s cat.

Meanwhile, somewhere down the street, a local band is loading their own gear into a van that smells like old coffee and regret. They will play whether ten people show up or two hundred. They will play sick. They will play tired. They will play because showing up is the whole damn point. They don’t get to cancel half their dates and still be mythologized. They get one no-show before the scene quietly moves on without them.

That’s the contrast that hurts. Morrissey can cancel forty-nine out of a hundred shows and still sell tickets to the next one because nostalgia is the most powerful drug in the world. It keeps whispering, Maybe this time. It keeps telling us that the version of him we loved in 1986 is still hiding somewhere behind the scrim of lawsuits, grievances, and canceled soundchecks.

And look—I get it. I’d probably still roll the dice myself. To be perfectly honest, I have taken the chance, and I was fortunate in seeing a Morrissey show. That’s the sickness and the beauty of loving music that mattered to you when you were young. You keep hoping for communion even when history tells you to expect a refund.

How Soon Is Now? Very Possibly Never

But let’s stop pretending this is just bad luck. Over the last six years, the data tells a story as clear as any lyric Morrissey ever wrote: absence has become as defining as presence. Cancellation is no longer an exception; it’s a feature.

This isn’t a moral failing so much as a cosmic joke. The man who taught us how to feel has turned unreliability into an art form. The fans keep showing up to an empty stage, humming along to songs about disappointment, living inside the metaphor, whether they like it or not.

And maybe that’s the final, bitter punchline: Morrissey still understands his audience perfectly. He just doesn’t have to be there to prove it.

Dr. J’s Desert Island Albums: The Living Rock and Roll Circus with Kiss

The concept of desert island records and songs has become a fascinating cultural phenomenon, reflecting the profound impact that music can have on our lives. The idea stems from the hypothetical scenario of being stranded on a deserted island with only a limited selection of albums or songs. In this isolated setting, individuals are forced to choose a handful of musical companions that would accompany them through the challenges of solitude. An album in the desert island collection is considered a person’s absolute favorite, one they could listen to repeatedly and never tire of, making their social and physical isolation on an imagined desert island more bearable and more survivable.- Playing these songs and records transports the listener somewhere else, somewhere comfortable and meaningful.

These selections often transcend mere musical preferences, representing a deeply personal and emotional connection to specific tracks or albums. Desert island records are not just about the tunes themselves; they encapsulate memories, emotions, and moments in time. The chosen music becomes a source of solace, inspiration, and a reminder of the outside world.

People’s desert island picks vary widely, showcasing the diversity of musical tastes and the unique ways in which individuals relate to different genres and artists. Whether it’s the soothing melodies of a favorite album or the empowering lyrics of a cherished song, the desert island concept underscores the transformative power of music in shaping our identities and sustaining our spirits, even in the most isolated circumstances. As a cultural phenomenon, it highlights the enduring significance of music as a universal language that transcends boundaries and connects us to our deepest selves.

“Kiss Alive,” released on September 10, 1975, stands as a landmark album in the history of rock music, particularly in the realm of live recordings. This double-disc compilation not only captured the raw energy and charisma of Kiss’s live performances but also catapulted the band to new heights of success. This album — the band’s fourth — is a desert island record for us here at Your Tuesday Afternoon Alternative. In explaining why this record is among the all time favorites of Dr. J, we explore the significance of “Kiss Alive,” delving into its impact on the band’s career, the live album genre, and its enduring influence on subsequent generations of musicians and fans. I received a copy of the album a few years after its release and devoured the record. I grew up in a small Minnesotan farming community, population 550 (seriously!) and the thought of attending an iconic rock and roll concert was a dream that would not come true for a few years for me. However, with “Kiss Alive” I felt as if I were attending a dynamic rock and roll concert. It seemed like I was there in the audience. And that sense of being at a show was a significant characteristic of this record. No other record in my collection has had such a powerful influence on me when I put it on the record player.

“Kiss Alive” emerged during a crucial juncture in Kiss’s career. By 1975, the band had released three studio albums — “Kiss” (1973), “Hotter Than Hell” (1974), and “Dressed to Kill” (1975) — that garnered a dedicated fan base but hadn’t achieved mainstream success. The decision to release a live album was a strategic move, intended to capture the essence of their explosive live shows and convey the power of their stage presence to a wider audience. The album was compiled from recordings of concerts in Detroit, Cleveland, Wildwood, and Davenport during the band’s “Dressed to Kill” tour. The choice of a live album was not only a response to the lukewarm commercial reception of their studio albums but also a testament to Kiss’s belief in the authenticity and intensity of their live performances.

“Kiss Alive” turned out to be a game-changer for the band. The album peaked at No. 9 on the Billboard 200 chart and marked Kiss’s first top-ten album. Its success was instrumental in propelling the band into the mainstream, introducing them to a broader audience. The raw, unbridled energy captured on the album resonated with fans, and “Kiss Alive” quickly became a commercial juggernaut. This success continues today as 97% of Google users like the album.

The album breathed new life into songs that had previously gone unnoticed. Tracks like “Deuce,” “Strutter,” and “Black Diamond” took on a new dimension in the live setting, solidifying their place in the Kiss repertoire. The live versions became definitive renditions, and in some cases, they even surpassed the studio recordings in popularity.

“Kiss Alive” didn’t just elevate the status of the band; it also played a pivotal role in redefining the live album genre. Prior to its release, live albums were often considered secondary to studio recordings, serving as a means for artists to fulfill contractual obligations rather than a medium for artistic expression. “Kiss Alive” challenged this perception by demonstrating that a live album could capture the spirit and dynamism of a live performance, providing listeners with an immersive experience that transcended the studio environment. The success of “Kiss Alive” opened the floodgates for other bands to explore the live album format as a legitimate and powerful artistic statement.

One of the distinguishing features of “Kiss Alive” is its cinematic quality. The album wasn’t just an audio experience; it was a sonic journey that transported listeners into the heart of a Kiss concert. The sequencing of tracks, the interplay between band members and the audience, and the seamless transitions between songs created a narrative arc that mirrored the ebb and flow of a live performance.

The album opens with the iconic sound of a roaring crowd, setting the stage for the sonic assault that follows. Each song is like a chapter in the Kiss saga, with Paul Stanley, Gene Simmons, Ace Frehley, and Peter Criss each contributing their unique elements to the musical narrative. The album’s pacing and structure were carefully crafted to maintain the momentum and excitement of a live show, making it a cohesive and immersive experience for the listener.

Beyond its impact on the music industry, “Kiss Alive” became a cultural phenomenon. The album cover, featuring the iconic image of the band against a stark black background, captured the mystique and theatricality that defined Kiss’s image. The visual impact of the cover art complemented the sonic intensity of the music, creating a cohesive and memorable package.

Kiss’s stage presence and elaborate costumes, coupled with their signature face paint, became synonymous with the band’s identity. This visual spectacle, combined with the energy of their live performances as showcased on Kiss Alive, contributed to the band’s larger-than-life persona. Kiss wasn’t just a musical act; they were a multimedia experience, and “Kiss Alive” served as a gateway for fans to immerse themselves in the sonic world of Kiss.

“Kiss Alive’s” influence extends far beyond its initial release. The album laid the groundwork for the subsequent success of Kiss and paved the way for other artists to explore the potential of live recordings. It remains one of the best-selling live albums of all time and has been certified multi-platinum, a testament to its enduring popularity.

Moreover, “Kiss Alive” continues to inspire generations of musicians. The unbridled energy, the connection with the audience, and the sense of spectacle have become touchstones for artists seeking to create memorable live experiences. The album’s impact on the development of the hard rock and heavy metal genres is undeniable, with countless bands citing Kiss as a major influence.

Kiss Alive stands as a pinnacle in the history of live albums, showcasing the transformative power of a well-executed live recording. Its impact on Kiss’s career, the live album genre, and popular culture as a whole cannot be overstated. Kiss Alive is not merely a document of a band’s live performances; it is a sonic and visual journey that captures the essence of a musical revolution.

As Kiss celebrates its legacy after their final live concert, “Kiss Alive” remains a timeless testament to the band’s ability to connect with audiences and leave an indelible mark on the world of rock music. It is a sonic time capsule that transports listeners back to the mid-1970s, allowing them to experience the magic of a Kiss concert whenever the needle drops on those iconic vinyl grooves.

Fading Applause: Unearthing Some Reasons Behind the Decline in Attending Local Music Shows

In the throes of a vibrant local music scene, one might expect shows in the community to be a cultural cornerstone, drawing diverse crowds in droves for a singular reason, seeing great local music. Yet, in recent years, there has been a decline in the attendance of these grassroots gatherings. Even before the Covid-19 pandemic, a decline in the number of people attending music events was shrinking. As I dig deep into this challenge, we take some time and think about the many reasons why people are increasingly opting to stay home rather than stepping out for a night of live music. In the spirit of trying to understand this so that we can encourage attendance at local shows, let’s embark on a brief effort to explore the dynamics that are reshaping the landscape of local music event attendance.

I have to be honest about my motivation. I am an active show-goer! I attend many local, regional, and national music events and shows. I am a passionate supporter of local, Dayton, Ohio, and regional music — a major premise of Your Tuesday Afternoon Alternative.

I was fortunate to experience some amazing music during my college years (1983-1988) in the state of Minnesota during a time of unbelievable explosion in creativity attending shows from Husker Du, The Replacements, Soul Asylum, Prince, The Gear Daddies, The Suburbs, The Jayhawks, Run Westy Run, ZuZu’s Petals, and so many more. I also saw touring bands such as R.E.M., The Connells, The dbs, NRBQ, Miracle Legion, The Ramones, and far more than there is time to list. And since the 2000s, I have attended more local shows in the Dayton, Ohio area than I can list here. Mrs. Dr. J and I spend time each week planning what shows we will attend and there are more shows that we would go see than we have time.

The Allure of Digital Convenience

One inescapable factor reshaping the landscape of local music event attendance is the digital age. In an era where the world is at our fingertips, streaming services and virtual concerts offer an unparalleled level of convenience. The ease of tuning into your favorite artist’s live stream from the comfort of your own home is a siren song that has seduced many away from the raucous atmosphere of local venues.

Digital platforms not only offer ease of access but also empower fans to curate their music experiences. With personalized playlists and algorithmic recommendations, listeners can indulge in a highly tailored musical journey, often without the need to step one single foot outside. The pull of the digital realm is undeniably strong and presents a substantial challenge for local music scenes. That coupled with the abysmally low compensation for digital streams can create a financial hardship for bands and musicians.

Economic Considerations

Local music events have traditionally been an affordable and accessible option for music fans. However, the economics of entertainment have been shifting beneath our feet. Ticket prices, particularly for well-known local acts, have been creeping upwards, costs that were under $20 for a couple have now increased as acts and venues seek to recoup expenses. Considering the cost of transportation, parking, drinks, and merchandise, attending local music events can strain the budgets of many.

Furthermore, the gig economy has reshaped the financial stability of younger generations, making disposable income scarcer. This financial precariousness forces potential attendees to weigh the value of a night out against other financial priorities and expenses. For some, the fun of local music events is overshadowed by the economic realities of life in the 21st century.

Changing Tastes

Music, like any art form, evolves over time, and so do its listeners. What fans want to hear changes. The kinds of performances that draw a crowd evolve. The changing demographics of music audiences have led to a diversification of musical tastes and preferences. Local music events, with their challenge of advertising — the perennial problem of ‘getting the word out’ — may not always reach the eclectic tastes of a diverse audience.

As a result, individuals who prefer genres or styles not typically showcased at local events may be disinclined to attend. The widening spectrum of musical genres, coupled with the ease of access to niche music communities online, means that many can explore their musical interests without ever leaving their comfort zones.

We also have to consider that the reluctance to attend local shows may have increased post-pandemic. There may be a greater concern about being in a crowd due to health concerns.

The Urbanization Conundrum

In the shifting demographic landscape, urbanization has played a critical role in reshaping local music event attendance. Cities are cultural hubs teeming with artistic expression, and local music scenes thrive in these environments. Yet, the downside of urbanization is the relentless pace of life and the reluctance of folks who live in the suburbs to come into the city to experience music events. For some city dwellers, the cacophony of daily life is enough to discourage them from seeking out additional auditory stimulation at local events.

Furthermore, urban areas are often marked by high living costs, making it challenging for residents to prioritize regular attendance at local music events. The erosion of affordability in urban centers can lead to a decline in the vibrancy of local music scenes.

The Virtual Spectacle vs. the Live Experience

The allure of virtual entertainment, I discussed above, has challenged the primacy of the live music experience. Virtual concerts and livestreams allow artists to reach global audiences without the constraints of venue capacity or geographic location. While this may be a boon for artists, it poses a dilemma for local music scenes. If you can see your favorite artists without leaving home, why go to a local show?

The virtual spectacle, enhanced by breathtaking visuals and immersive technology, can rival the in-person experience. As artists invest in creating jaw-dropping digital performances, the question of whether the palpable energy of a live crowd can compete arises for us. For some, the convenience and spectacle of virtual entertainment outweigh the communal experience of local music events. However, the solitary experience of watching a concert in your living room separated from your friends and fellow music lovers can feel hollow. Of course, this assumes that people want to experience music together with people they may not know.

The decline in local music event attendance is a complex web of economic factors, shifting cultural tastes, technological convenience, and the pull of virtual entertainment. As the music industry continues to evolve in the digital age, local scenes must adapt to these changing dynamics to remain relevant and vibrant. To lure audiences back into the heart of their local music communities, venues and artists alike must offer experiences that transcend the allure of digital convenience and rekindle the magic of the live music event and the community that is built in those experiences. In doing so, we can ensure that the fading applause of local music events reverberates once more, echoing through the spaces where music is played.

What factors would you add to this consideration? What can we do to encourage more people to attend music events and shows in our local communities?